Muslims who counter IS atrocities on women

The Islamic State's brutality toward women deserves both criticism and counterexamples. When the new president of Afghanistan thanks his wife in public, Muslims notice.

Scott Peterson/Getty Images
Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai arrives to vote with his wife, Rula Ghani, in the first round of presidential elections April 5.

Afghanistan passed a big milestone Sept. 29 with its first peaceful, democratic transfer of power. But just as remarkable to many Afghans was the inauguration event for the new president, Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai.

Not only was his wife, Rula Ghani, at the swearing-in ceremony, he also warmly thanked her for supporting him and announced she would be active as first lady in humanitarian causes. This would not be unusual in most democracies. But in deeply patriarchal and conservatively Muslim Afghanistan, the gesture was a stunner. The previous first lady, Zeenat Karzai, was rarely seen in public, just the kind of obscurity widely expected of Afghan women.

The new president’s open gratitude to his wife, a well-educated Lebanese-American, sends a signal about the continuity of progress for women in Afghanistan since the 2001 ouster of the Taliban. Some 40 percent of all schoolchildren are girls, for example, and a quarter of parliament members are women. Yet his gesture also helps balance reports about the thousands of women mistreated in Iraq and Syria by the Islamic State group.

On Sept. 25, for example, IS executed a female human rights lawyer, Samira al-Nuaimy, one of many atrocities reportedly committed by a radical group attempting to impose strict rules on Iraqi and Syrian women in the name of Islam.

President Obama, in his Sept. 10 speech justifying American airstrikes on IS, summed up the militants this way: “They enslave, rape, and force women into marriage.”

Countering the many impositions on Muslim women remains a crucial element in the creation of more free and pluralistic societies in Islamic nations. In Pakistan and Indonesia, women have served as top elected leaders (although in part because they were daughters of legendary fathers who ruled). Such examples give hope to young Muslim women. But just as important is challenging the anti-female ideology of jihadist groups like IS.

In a recent article in the publication Foreign Policy, two former CIA analysts, Tara Maller and Aki Peritz, asked why the sexual violence of IS does not receive more attention. “Why isn’t this crime against humanity getting more consistent attention in the West?” they wrote. “Those covering war may be more inclined to cover airstrikes, beheadings, and market bombings because they are historically viewed as ‘hard’ security issues, while threats to women and children tend to be viewed as ‘softer’ humanitarian concerns.”

On Sept. 24, a group of more than 120 international scholars of Islam issued a 28-page report refuting the ideas of IS, including those about women. The scholars pointed out where IS gets it wrong: “In simple terms, you treat women like detainees and prisoners; they dress according to your whims; they are not allowed to leave their homes and they are not allowed to go to school.... Nor are they allowed to work or earn a living; nor allowed to move about freely and they are forced to marry your fighters.”

Against such behavior, the words of the new Afghan leader about his wife stand out like a white badge on a black burqa. Progress often comes in such a soft-spoken manner.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.