A global nix on nicotine's new delivery system

Most nations help people be free of tobacco addiction. Now the WHO wants a ban on indoor use of 'electronic nicotine delivery systems,' or e-cigarettes, as well as their sale to children. A global meeting in October should endorse such steps.

Reuters
A heated, watery vapor is emitted from an e-cigarette, or an 'electronic nicotine delivery system.' On Tuesday, the WHO recommended strong steps against such addictive devices.

In a sign of how much the world wants to end the habit for nicotine, 179 countries have joined a 2005 treaty that restricts tobacco use. Now this October, when they meet in Moscow, these nations may take a further step and agree to ban the use of electronic cigarettes indoors as well as sales to children.

The two steps were recommended Tuesday by the World Health Organization (WHO) in a comprehensive study of what the agency calls “electronic nicotine delivery systems,” or ENDS. The use of the name “e-cigarettes,” says the United Nations body, only adds to the allure of a device that provides a heated vapor of toxicants, including nicotine, directly to the user but also to bystanders.

The evidence on whether ENDS actually help smokers quit tobacco is still not clear, the WHO concludes. Nor is there independent evidence about the health risks. Yet the industry is booming as Big Tobacco has put its marketing muscle behind the product. Last year’s sales were estimated to be $3 billion, up from only $20 million in 2008. And the market may grow 17 times by 2030.

Such growth does not suggest ENDS are seen by most users or the industry as a medical device for quitting regular smoking.

The WHO worries the devices may be a “gateway” to smoking and set back progress in preventing tobacco use, especially if the industry continues to target children. A clear sign of such targeting: The products come in thousands of flavors, from candy to alcoholic drinks. The agency also says their use might erode public support for smoke-free zones.

About half the world’s population now live in countries that already regulate the products to some degree. When the treaty nations meet this fall, they should take a strong stand to help people choose to be free of an addiction to nicotine. The best starting point is to protect nonsmoking bystanders and children.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.