How Haiti earthquake launched 'digital humanitarianism'

On the anniversary of the 2010 Haiti earthquake, it is remarkable to see what was learned about 'crisis mapping' from social media during the natural disaster.

AP Photo
A boy sits next to his house in a refugee camp in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, Jan. 10. The Haitian government delivered a progress report on the eve of the fourth anniversary of the earthquake that killed hundreds of thousands. Prime Minister Laurent Lamothe highlighted a drop in the number of people living in settlements.

When an earthquake devastated Haiti four years ago on Jan. 12, it also shook up how the world responds to such disasters. With the use of the Internet and mobile phones, survivors in Haiti sent out cries for help through tweets, texting, Facebook, and other digital media. Volunteers around the world then sifted the information to create a digital map on computers to guide relief workers and the American military toward the people most in need.

This real-time “crisis mapping” saved thousands of lives.

On the fourth anniversary of the earthquake, it is worth noting how much “digital humanitarianism” has come of age, breaking down the barriers of space and time and allowing individuals globally to better help others after a large natural disaster.

With each leap in communication technology, compassion knows fewer boundaries. Just as CNN improved on the speed of newspapers in reporting on a crisis, the digital mapping of social media improves on CNN, compiling and digesting data through crowdsourcing. During Roman times, Jesus asked, “Having ears, hear ye not?” Today, the question might be: “Having a crisis map of disaster X, respond ye not?”

The technique of digital mapping from large groups of people first gained attention in Kenya in 2007-08 when social-media reports were used to warn of possible post-election violence. But after the Haiti quake, it took off for humanitarian purposes, notably after the 2011 tsunami in Japan and the giant typhoon in the Philippines last November.

And just in time. The United Nations reports that the number of people in need of humanitarian aid each year has nearly doubled to about 60 million over the past decade.

Using computers to sift through social media during a crisis is still a work in progress. The technique may not work in areas where smart phones are few, the Internet is broken or nonexistent, or literacy rates are low. Special software is needed to translate tweets or texts from one language to another.

Most of all, the accuracy of reports cannot always be assured. Still, when such information is supplemented by satellite imagery or reports from helicopters, it can generate critical information about problems such as broken bridges, food shortages, or acute health needs.

Crisis maps not only raise awareness of a disaster but can hold aid agencies more accountable for their response. By relying on social media, such maps can engage tech-savvy young people. They can help lift the gloom around a disaster by making it easier to bring comfort to those in need.

Haiti itself still needs more foreign assistance and domestic reforms to recover from the 2010 earthquake. But as a testing ground for the new technology of crisis mapping, the country has made a global contribution.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.