A global model for peacebuilding – in Somalia?

One of the world's most famous failed states, Somalia, finally shows surprising signs of progress. One reason may be Somali fatigue over violence, anarchy, and foreign meddling.

Reuters
A Somali National Army soldier stands outside the port city of Kismayo after the jihadist rebels al Shabab rebels retreated on Friday.

Somalia has long been the very model of a modern failed state. The largely ungoverned country on the Horn of Africa has suffered through pirates, terrorists, warlords, foreign invaders, and bandits, not to mention famine. Since 1991, more than a dozen plans to fix it have been tried by the international community.

For a world now very weary of mistakes made in trying to push democracy in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria, it is easy to forget about Somalia.

But we shouldn’t.

Since August, Somalis have set up a new parliament and chosen a respected president, Hassan Sheikh Mahmoud, under a new constitution. Many of the worst warlords have been outflanked by a “constructive elite.” And last Friday, the last stronghold of armed jihadist group Al Shabab fell to Kenyan and Somali troops in a night raid on the port town of Kismayo.

Much more still needs to be done before Somalia can be called a functioning country with a democracy. The gains made so far are fragile. But experts wonder if these latest hopeful actions show that Somalis are finally so fed up with violence, anarchy, and foreign intervention that they are now ready to build state institutions through inclusive politics and to reclaim their sovereignty and unity.

If so, Somalia may serve as a new kind of model, one in which years of failed foreign meddling actually had the effect of pushing locals to reconcile their differences and seek a democratic solution on their own. Part of that feeling is probably due to to a feeling that Somalia has been seen by the United States since 9/11 as just another pawn-state in a global contest with Al Qaeda.

Despite years of civil war, Somalis remain a resourceful and resilient people. They have managed to build one of Africa’s best cellphone and money-transfer systems, a good sign of social trust. In the year since the Al Qaeda-allied Al Shabab was forced to exit the capital of Mogadishu, a market economy has sprung back. Somalis have an active civil society.

Somalia also serves as a lesson for better understanding local culture and clan dynamics before imposing foreign solutions. Iraq and Afghanistan certainly point to that need. The current caution of the West toward meddling militarily in Syria’s ethnic-sectarian muddle is driven by such lessons.

Letting the new Somali government take the lead may be the best course for the US and others, especially in possibly negotiating a political settlement with Al Shabab. The country’s days of being a model, either good or bad, may be over. Soon, Somalia could simply be another country struggling with the problems of peace, not war, and doing so on its own strengths.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.