Readers write: Finding balance, from migration to personal lives

Letters to the editor from the April 1 Weekly. Readers discussed New York’s migrants, the power of visibility for Native people, and the true meaning of 'enough.'

Covering New York’s migrants

The article “Are jobs the solution to New York’s migrant crisis?” in the Jan. 22 Weekly was both informative and troubling. 

It does a good job of summarizing the hurdles that asylum-seekers and immigrants face to pay the bills. (Though I do wish that journalists would emphasize that the two populations are distinct and different from those crossing the United States-Mexico border for work or those overstaying a tourist visa.) 

The story summarizes nicely that allowing nonresidents to work is a win-win solution, reducing the burden on the public budget while also filling a need for workers due to the record-low unemployment. I would have appreciated a line or two about how these newly authorized workers also contribute to Social Security and pay other taxes on earnings.

Misinformation that immigrants are receiving “$2,200 a month” is making rounds on social media. It is revealing that the anti-
immigrant message has adapted from “They’re taking our jobs” to “They’re living off the public dime.” Make no mistake, it seems like the objective is the same: to turn our fellow humans into “less than” and perpetually inflame the “us versus them” sentiment that weakens our society.

This article was also troubling because of one of the organizations that it relied on for a quote (as have many other reputable publications, unfortunately). The Center for Immigration Studies may sound objective, but its message is entirely anti-immigration. In fact, the Southern Poverty Law Center considers it a hate group.

Rusty Wyrick
Ghivizzano, Italy

Can shrimpers make a living?

Thank you for writing about the shrimp industry in “From Bubba Gump to bust? American shrimpers face extinction.” from the March 4 Weekly! Shrimp from overseas farming has long been on the “avoid” list because of the industry’s damage to the environment, the forced labor, and use of antibiotics and herbicide. If people were more informed about this, shrimpers like Brian Jordan and Tommy Faulkner would be able to make a living without these negatives.

Christine Matthews
Washington

The value of visibility

Thank you for your articles and references to Native people. It gives them value in contrast to their invisibility in society. I particularly appreciate the story “Preserving Mohawk at Akwesasne Freedom School” in the Jan. 22 Weekly about the Mohawk school in New York and Canada. My husband is Mohawk, and our three children’s ancestral land and heritage is in that area.

Lizabeth Mckibben
Venice, Florida

Worth more than money

How ironic that the Feb. 5 cover story “Lagom” was in the same issue as the Numbers in the News feature stating that the five richest people in the world doubled their wealth between 2020 and 2023! I now see that I have been practicing my own version of lagom for most of my adult life. 

After college, I worked for 18 years in business before realizing it was not making me happy. I quit my corporate job and spent the rest of my career only working at things that I enjoyed. The money was less, especially at the beginning, but I was able to move up in these more enjoyable jobs and provide a nice living for my family. My yardstick through the years was always, “Only work at jobs that I would do for free.” 

I discovered that earning less money and being happy was better than earning lots of money and being miserable.

To me, that’s what lagom is all about.

Rick Soule
Surprise, Arizona

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Readers write: Finding balance, from migration to personal lives
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Readers-Respond/2024/0406/Readers-write-Finding-balance-from-migration-to-personal-lives
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe