Readers write: Amid Gaza war, preserving humanity

Letters to the editor from the Dec. 4 Weekly. Readers discussed the importance of remembering each other’s humanity amid war, and the persistence of tipping.

The human angle

Kudos on getting the humanitarian story in the article “With food and shelter scarce in Gaza, Palestinians turn to each other” from the Nov. 6 Weekly. It is so unfortunate that the majority of Palestinians who are suffering under Hamas are unable to get out from under those conditions. 

Though it is refreshing to hear that they are sharing among themselves (much like their Israeli counterparts), one has to ask whether they could root out Hamas from launching attacks from civilian areas. If they could achieve that, they could help end this nightmare.

Howard Tenenbaum
San Diego

Putting humanity first

The piece “On war in Gaza, an appeal: ‘Let’s preserve a space for humanity’” in the Nov. 1 Daily landed in my heart and made me teary. This is the perspective and potency that the Monitor brings to the world – understanding humanity first, as well as the value of life, comfort, compassion, and respect. From these values, wise decisions flow. 

For this reason, in my opinion, this article should have been the lead article and called out by the editor in the Daily (as an example of changes to come). It’s that significant. Then the second article, “Rashida Tlaib pushes for cease-fire in Gaza – and faces blowback” – which has outstanding scope – would have a balanced, respectful, responsible, and fair context. Great values right there as well. 

As long as the Monitor gives voice to the often muted and suppressed honest thinkers, I have hope. Thank you.

Chris Raymond
New London, New Hampshire

Why do we still tip? 

It has been evident for a long time that tips as a supplement to wages are a vestige of class distinctions. It was interesting, but in no way surprising, to read of their roots in racism in the story “Why ‘out of control’ tipping persists – for now” from the Sept. 20 Daily. 

“The Pullman Co. encouraged tipping to offset low wages,” the story reads. “In Pullman’s case those workers were porters, many of whom had been previously enslaved.”

Fresh out of college, I very occasionally dined at a well-known seafood restaurant in Miami Beach, Florida. The servers were almost all white and male; at least by appearances, most were from the University of Miami – a private university with steep tuition costs. I dined more frequently at a chain restaurant serving breakfast all day. The servers there were almost all women, of diverse racial backgrounds, and truly “international.”

At the former restaurant, a 15% tip was often two, three, or even four times the cost of an entire meal at the latter restaurant. And yet, the women at the “pancake house” were working just as hard (and surely supporting their families on the meager wages and tips they received).

There are two more problems with tipping. One, because cash is often the preferred method to tip, it is usually up to the server to declare this income. It should surprise no one that many people choose to not do so, which means less revenue to the government; we all “pay” for this unfair system. Secondly, the employer does not contribute the Social Security, Medicare, and workers’ compensation portion on undeclared cash income. And the employee, if they omit it from their income declaration, is thus doubly deprived of the full benefit they would be entitled to if compensated with a living wage.

It’s past time for Congress to eliminate the two-tier wage law. Unfortunately, employers and employees would protest the loudest against this much-needed reform.

Rusty Wyrick
Ghivizzano, Italy

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Readers write: Amid Gaza war, preserving humanity
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Readers-Respond/2023/1202/Readers-write-Amid-Gaza-war-preserving-humanity
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe