Security for Trump
Regarding the Dec. 20 article “Trump could set new precedent with private security force” (CSMonitor.com): I lived in Argentina during the “dirty war,” a time in which military dictator Jorge Rafael Videla “disappeared” 30,000 Argentines who opposed him. Men and women of all ages were taken away, interrogated, tortured, and shot. (In Buenos Aires, we heard the soldiers shooting people against a wall at night. We kept the apartment lights off.)
How was this accomplished?
Mr. Videla operated through secret police who mingled among people as they conversed. Often, these were people you knew. They listened to conversations, took down names, and later, those people simply vanished.
What I see now is disturbingly familiar. President Trump has a “security force” of his own. They’ve been observed to circulate among demonstrators, taking note of who is protesting.
Mr. Trump’s propensity for keeping a list of his detractors is well known, as are his famous Twitter rants against those who criticize him, from the cast of the Broadway musical “Hamilton” to The New York Times to Vanity Fair after the magazine published a bad review of his restaurant.
How far will Trump go? Do we want to find out?
Role of seniors
A few benefits of an aging population were overlooked in the Jan. 2 & 9 cover story, “Where seniors count.” Seniors have wisdom, are less apt to swallow the hype for war, and are more tolerant of other cultures.
As societies age, we can hope that we seniors will say no to more war, no to the astronomical costs of supporting the government and its lobbyist friends, and yes to helping educate our youth, fixing the infrastructure, and making life healthier and happier for seniors.