Readers write: compassion in the abortion debate; not a Russian cold war this time
Letters to the editor for the April 11, 2016 weekly magazine.
Compassion in the abortion debate
Regarding the April 4 cover story, “Inside Texas’ abortion wars,” John Yemma wrote in his Upfront column, “Long after Roe v. Wade, the woman making this excruciating choice and the child that might or might not result will deserve our utmost compassion.” We should have compassion for everyone talking and thinking about it.
Vietnamese Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh tells us, “Compassion is a verb.” This conveys a fuller sense that our compassion as individuals should be active and engaged, whether with our sincere thoughts and conversations, prayerful thinking, or all of these. Let’s remember that all of mankind is invested in the issue.
David K. McClurkin
Regarding the March 25 online article “Indiana abortion law: Gov. Pence approves new restrictions” (CSMonitor.com): Indiana’s recent abortion ban based on prenatal disability diagnoses is anti-woman. The US Department of Agriculture estimates it will cost a family about $300,000 to raise one child. Care for youths with disabilities often costs twice to three times that amount. A woman who chooses to have an abortion has assessed her ability and desire to have a child. Her reasons for having this procedure are between her and her provider – and not the state.
Not a Russian cold war this time
Regarding the March 23 online article “US-Russia thaw? Kerry arrives in Moscow for Syria talks” (CSMonitor.com): A change in the Russia-United States relationship would not be a return from a situation like the cold war. In Russia, a real cold war would have meant no freedom of movement, no different parties in the State Duma, no private satellite dishes on apartment blocks. Very few in Russia suffer from, or even are aware of, what you call the freeze of the past two years. But virtually everyone has been euphoric over Crimea’s becoming part of Russia.