Readers write: Behind the Iran deal; Canada's short election cycle

Letters to the editor for the Nov. 9, 2015 weekly magazine.

Behind the Iran deal
Regarding the Oct. 19 cover story, “The Iran gambit”: Nothing against diplomacy, but the diplomatic approach with Iran must be leavened with a credible military threat, and no one any longer believes President Obama when he contends that the military option is still on the table.

Mr. Obama replaced conflict resolution with conflict management early in his attempt to come to grips with doomsday weaponry in the hands of Islamic true believers. The deal with Iran does not, as Obama says, keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons; it just delays that time for a decade or so.
Paul Bloustein
Cincinnati

Thank you to Andrew J. Bacevich for his Oct. 19 analysis, “The Iran gambit.” Finally, intelligent analysis instead of a rant.
Vici Oshiro
Burnsville, Minn.

Canada’s short election cycle
Regarding the Oct. 19 Briefing, “Canada’s election: N. American déjà vu?”: The Canadian national election for prime minister concluded with the election of Justin Trudeau to succeed Stephen Harper. Beyond the surprising results and the election issues, what is remarkable is that the campaign lasted for all of 78 days, which was far longer than many such Canadian campaigns.

But compare this with the duration of American presidential campaigns; the current one began months ago and will not end until November 2016. During that time, Americans will be subjected to endless and repetitive recitations of candidates’ qualifications (or lack thereof, depending on whom you ask) and their positions on the issues.

This results in millions of Americans tuning out and ignoring the candidates, which may partially explain the country’s abysmally low voter turnouts. The United States might consider following Canada’s example.
Stephen M. Arnold
McHenry, Ill.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Readers write: Behind the Iran deal; Canada's short election cycle
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Readers-Respond/2015/1107/Readers-write-Behind-the-Iran-deal-Canada-s-short-election-cycle
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe