Why Congress is gridlocked
The Nov. 3 cover story, “How to get Congress running again,” presented some very valuable ideas for improving US congressional rules and procedures. In order to make a major impact, however, we will have to attack the deeper roots of our democracy’s problems. The most important task is improving the quality of our national dialogue and debate, and the key factor here is runaway ideology.
Democracy today is experiencing a major collision between an increasingly complex world and increasingly rigid ideologies. The current political landscape in America is littered with the wreckage caused by rigid, stereotyped thinking. One of the biggest mistakes is to regard the blending of strategies and viewpoints as inherently weak. Balance in public affairs and human interactions is not just a compromise or a bland melting pot; it can also be a dynamic force.
It would be easy to be discouraged by ideological extremes, but many polls have shown that a considerable majority of Americans favor balanced, independent thinking. This leads me to think that it is possible to live in a balanced world where rigid labels and stereotypes are unnecessary and every question or problem is approached from a fresh perspective.
Balanced perspective on Congress
I have read and valued The Christian Science Monitor for many years. It has always been a very balanced, interesting, and thought-provoking publication. I want to give special thanks for the Nov. 3 cover story. The comments were insightful, logical, and nonpolitical. I fervently hope every member of Congress sees and reads it – as well as everyone working in government!
Also, I’m deeply appreciative of the new series “Points of Progress” as well as “People Making a Difference,” which spotlights the work of philanthropically oriented individuals as they see needs nationally and globally and work to alleviate them.