Readers Write: Corporal punishment isn't a crime; corporal punishment isn't necessary; conservatives have a narrow focus

Letters to the Editor for Nov. 3, 2014 weekly magazine:

Greene: As a child I was disciplined in the same way that Adrian Peterson disciplined his son, and though I am not for child abuse, there is nothing wrong with physical discipline. 

McPherson: Corporal punishment is never necessary. 

Elmasian: Conservatives trust three news outlets while the left trusts nine sources.

Billy Smith II/Houston Chronicle/AP/File
Attorney Rusty Hardin talks to the media on behalf of his client, Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson, behind Hardin, before leaving the Montgomery County courthouse in Conroe, Texas on Oct. 8. A judge tentatively set a Dec. 1 trial date for Peterson on a charge of felony child abuse for using a wooden switch to discipline his 4-year-old son earlier this year. Accompanying Peterson are is mother, Bonita Jackson, left, and his wife Ashley Brown Peterson.

Spanking isn’t always abuse 

The Oct. 20 cover story, “To spank or not to spank,” really bothered me because as a child I was disciplined in the same way that Adrian Peterson disciplined his son. He was arrested on child abuse charges for giving what he called a “whupping.” I got many of those whippings and I turned out well. There is a fine line between child abuse and disciplining your child by putting hands on him or her. I don’t condone child abuse or how Mr. Peterson disciplined his son. When signs of abuse are shown, there is no other choice but to report the individual. Hitting a child repeatedly is not going to change anything. Every parent sees discipline differently, and there are many ways to physically discipline a child that should not be considered child abuse. 

Kenan Greene
Wahiawa, Hawaii

Physical discipline not a necessity

Regarding the Oct. 20 Christian Science Perspective article, “No need for corporal punishment”: The truth that “Love is reflected in love” (see “Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures,” by Mary Baker Eddy, p. 17) precludes the necessity for either corporal or capital punishment. The Monitor has led in its stand against the latter, as violence only begets more violence, and this perspective on the former is consistent with a stance for a more spiritual view of life and identity.

Marilyn McPherson
Berkeley, Calif. 

Conservatives have a narrow focus

Regarding the Oct. 21 online story “Yes, conservatives watch Fox – but it’s more nuanced than that, survey finds” (CSMonitor.com): This was a good story, except the right is much more estranged than it indicates. According to a Pew survey, “Where News Audiences Fit on the Political Spectrum,” half or more of the “consistently conservative” trust just four news sources, three of which are talk shows. In contrast, a majority of the left trusts nine sources, all of which feature reported news.

Robert Elmasian 
via e-mail

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Readers Write: Corporal punishment isn't a crime; corporal punishment isn't necessary; conservatives have a narrow focus
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Readers-Respond/2014/1101/Readers-Write-Corporal-punishment-isn-t-a-crime-corporal-punishment-isn-t-necessary-conservatives-have-a-narrow-focus
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe