Readers Write: Precision needed on climate change numbers; Interpreting the Quran

Letters to the Editor for the September 23, 2013 weekly print magazine:

Only about 3 percent of the Antarctic temperature rise occurred during the time of humans burning fossil fuels. Climate change is a complex subject. The 'facts' about it must be stated precisely.

Does interpreting the Quran according to the spirit of our time mean that truth has no universal quality, but instead a temporary one?

Precision on climate change figures

The Prime Numbers column of the Sept. 2 issue included a factoid sourced to Reuters stating that the researchers for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are 95 percent certain that "half of Earth's global warming is caused by human emission of greenhouse gases." This is a rather casual generalization, since there is no time frame given for "Earth's global warming" over which the factor of one-half is calculated.

I suspect that the time frame implied is the last century or so, with an average global temperature rise of about 1.5 to 2 degrees F., and it is certainly plausible that half of that rise can be traced to human activity. However, this is not the whole story: Earth has gone through multiple warming and cooling cycles over geologic time scales. The warming phase of the latest cycle started about 20,000 years ago. Based upon Antarctic ice-core data, the temperature rise between that time and the present is about 15 degrees F.

The same data also indicate that the temperature rise in the Antarctic over the past 200 years (roughly corresponding to the start of the Industrial Revolution) is about 0.5 degrees F. Thus, over the full geologic warming cycle, only about 3 percent of the Antarctic temperature rise occurs during the period of large-scale human burning of fossil fuels. Climate change is a complex subject and the "facts" about it must be stated precisely.

Steven K. Brierley

Westford, Mass.

Interpreting truth in the Quran

I read Emran El-Badawi's Sept. 2 commentary "Muslims should welcome fresh take on prophet's sayings" with great interest.

In praising a new seven-volume revision of the Muslim Hadith, Mr. El-Badawi seems to say that sharia (Islamic law) and the Quran should not be taken literally but should be interpreted according to the values of modern society. Does this mean that we should interpret the Quran according to the spirit of our time? And does this mean that truth has no universal quality, but instead a temporary one?

Angelo A. De Gennaro

San Antonio

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.