Readers Write: The real definition and drivers of poverty

Letters to the Editor for the weekly print issue of November 5, 2012: Poverty is American hardly compares to poverty in Africa – in attitude and in hardship. The real cause of poverty in the US is job-killing free trade and oligarchic rule that widens the gap between rich and poor.

Real definition and drivers of poverty

The Oct. 8 cover story, "Who are you calling poor?," has an apt headline. One cannot help contrasting the pictures of well-fed (even plump) "impoverished" Americans discussed in the article with the photographs of gaunt, hollow-eyed parents and their children that we see in the letters from international aid charities.

As Jina Moore notes in her second article, "Gauging poverty from Appalachia to Africa," her Rwandan friends address their poverty with hard work, family- and community-sharing, and self-reliance. Perhaps the money Americans spend on one television set could be sent to a Rwandan family.

Phyllis Binkley

Dorset, Vt.

I hope the topic of poverty becomes the subject of a multipart series showing the myriad causes involved. Two Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalists, Donald Barlett and James Steele, have covered poverty for 40 years. They argue in their new book, "The Betrayal of the American Dream," that one big driver of poverty is free trade – supported by both US political parties. The consequence of free trade is now a US trade deficit of $10 trillion – resulting in enormous job losses. This problem should be in the mainstream discourse.

Unfortunately, the outsourcing of jobs has grown beyond the manufacturing sector to what Mr. Barlett and Mr. Steele list as 160 occupations, including high-value jobs such as aerospace engineers, anthropologists, chemical engineers, and even fashion designers. Large companies are even handing proprietary technology over to the Chinese. Meanwhile, our trading partners subsidize their own industries, such as solar, making it difficult for US companies to compete. US public policies need to be rethought.

As a result of job losses, America's tax revenue suffers. The loss of high-paying jobs is also doing much to enlarge the divide between the very, very rich and the fast-dwindling middle class. An oligarchic rule must be guarded against. America thrives on the middle class; we need to nourish and protect it.

The Monitor, with its excellent, impartial investigative reporting, can play a role in educating readers about the real causes of poverty.

Yvonne Renoult

San Francisco

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.