Readers Write: The perils of allowing women in combat

Letters to the Editor for the September 10, 2012 weekly print issue: The policy decision to allow women to serve in infantry combat should only be made after diligent consideration of the long-term effects – on women, the military, and the country.

Perils of allowing women in combat

The July 2 cover story, "Up in arms," includes some convincing points for why women should be allowed in US military combat positions. Before forming an opinion on this issue, I implore readers to study Capt. Katie Petronio's June 2012 article in the Marine Corps Gazette.

Ms. Petronio served valiantly during combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, attached to Marine infantry units as a Female Engagement Team operator, and graduated at the top of her Marine Officer Training class. After five years in the corps, she had this to say: "As a combat-experienced Marine officer, and a female, I am here to tell you that we are not all created equal, and attempting to place females in the infantry will not improve the Marine Corps...."

Petronio describes myriad injuries she endured in three short years with the infantry, including some that doctors believe to be the cause of her infertility. She goes on to say: "I am confident that should the Marine Corps attempt to fully integrate women into the infantry, we as an institution are going to experience a colossal increase in crippling and career-ending medical conditions for females."

Will more American women want to join the military, especially on an open contract, knowing they may be assigned to the infantry? The expected result will be fewer females volunteering to serve.

The Monitor's story cites the argument that women should be included in the infantry in order for more women to be competitive for promotion. But if women are in the infantry, it is only fair to apply one physical fitness standard to all, regardless of gender. This will likely lead to women ranking lower than their male counterparts – thus becoming less competitive for promotion.

If women serve in the infantry, Congress must also amend the Selective Service law to require all US women to register for the draft. Congress's reasoning (which the Supreme Court upheld) would disintegrate: Because women are excluded from direct combat, their service wouldn't be needed in the event of a draft.

Some of the most professional marines I have served with, especially on my two tours in Iraq as a Marine Corps attack helicopter pilot, were women. If a woman can meet the standard demands of the infantry, she should be given the opportunity, and I would gladly fight alongside my sister in arms. However, this policy decision should only be made after diligent consideration of the long-term effects.

David Dixon

Quantico, Va.


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Readers Write: The perils of allowing women in combat
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today