Readers Write: Natural gas won't save America

Letters to the Editor for the weekly print issue of May 21, 2012: Natural gas is a stopgap at best. What are the long-term risks of fracking? The real issue is the huge quantity of water used and chemically contaminated in the fracking process.

Natural gas can't meet all US needs

Regarding the April 23 cover story, "Who needs oil?": Natural gas for transportation is a stopgap at best. Gas reserves will diminish in proportion to the US shift to that resource for fuel. While forecasting exact supply and consumption is fraught with technical and economic considerations, the fact remains that fossil fuels are nonrenewable.

The sustainable path forward for managing our energy resources and our economic future starts with conservation in the spirit of cooperation.

Mark Delwiche

Idaho Falls, Idaho


While I certainly appreciated the balanced reporting of this subject, one set of questions was left unanswered: Exactly what kind of chemicals are being injected into the ground during the hydraulic fracturing (fracking) process?

And why are drilling companies choosing not to disclose these chemicals and their potential effect on the environment, namely the quality of drinking water for residents dependent on natural aquifers (water wells)? What are the long-term risks of this procedure, and how will drilling companies be accountable for any problems that may arise?

L'Wanda A. Greenlaw

Chagrin Falls, Ohio

The debate about the environmental impact of fracking for natural gas often focuses on whether nearby water wells and aquifers are contaminated by the fracking process. As important as that is, the real issue is the huge quantity of water used and chemically contaminated in the fracking process. According to a Chesapeake Energy website, a "deep shale natural gas or oil well requires an average of 4.5 million gallons per well."

It is the water that is the precious stuff here, not the gas. In light of global water shortages, when all the gas is burned or leaked, we may eventually wish we had the water. This seems like a backward alchemy, turning gold into lead.

David Momenee

Milford, N.H.


The cover story poses this question: Can natural gas save America? To my reading, the article provides an overriding framework for an answer to that question when it reports that the supply will last only 90 years. There are already some people among us who will see that day in their lifetimes.

Richard Montgomery

Gig Harbor, Wash.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to