Chinese dissident – bad timing for Washington, Beijing

Chinese dissident Chen's escape is inopportune. President Obama is in a tough election battle. China faces a leadership change. Washington's angst over how to protect Chen without infuriating Beijing is matched by Beijing's desire to silence him without incurring world disdain.

Benjamin Myers/Reuters
Members of the Christian Defense Coalition participate in a prayer vigil outside the Chinese embassy in Washington April 29. The group is calling on the Obama administration not to turn Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng over to the Chinese government. Says op-ed writer John Hughes: 'As Chinese citizens like Chen overcome blindness, imprisonment, confinement, and persecution in the cause of freedom, change is ultimately inevitable.'

It is difficult to imagine who must have been more agitated over the case of the escaping Chinese dissident – the president of the United States or the leaders of communist China.

For Barack Obama the daring escape from confinement of blind Chinese human rights protester Chen Guangcheng could not have come at a less politically propitious moment.

The president is in the midst of a tough campaign for re-election.

He has little to boast about at home. On the foreign front, though his removal of Osama bin Laden was a major triumph, he is criticized by his opponents for being tardy in coming to the aid of the oppressed in Libya and Syria, and for being soft on Russia.

His critical concern on the foreign front is China, America’s banker, whose cooperation he needs on a multitude of problems, especially difficult customers like Iran, North Korea, and Syria.

The sheltering of Mr. Chen by American diplomats in China could infuriate Beijing’s leaders. Not sheltering Chen – a self-taught lawyer who spoke out against forced abortions and sterilization – would play into the hands of Mr. Obama’s political opponents at home. They would count it as a contradiction of his calls upon China to observe human rights.

The angst in Washington over how to protect Chen without infuriating the Chinese regime could only have been matched in Beijing by the desire of the leadership there to silence Chen without incurring the world’s disdain.

China is currently on a global charm campaign which is hampered by some less-than-charming actions. It has been spending large sums on public diplomacy, especially TV and radio, and scores of Chinese “cultural” centers, many of them planned for the US, lauding China’s history and achievements.
In continents like Africa and Latin America – especially in countries able to help slake China’s new endless thirst for oil – the Chinese government has embarked on major construction and aid projects designed to establish long-term relationships.

The outreach program is far less successful in Asia where closer neighbors are alarmed about a major Chinese military buildup. A massive expansion of China’s naval presence will see many more Chinese warships in the East and South China Seas and the western Pacific ocean.

The problem China encounters in improving its image is widespread knowledge abroad about its undemocratic government and the brutal way it handles dissent. Its charm offensive is undercut when it prevents its Nobel peace prize winner, Liu Xiaobo, from leaving the country, and confines protesters like Chen.

The imbroglio over Chen comes at a particularly inopportune moment, when US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner are due in Beijing for strategic and economic talks on Thursday. The discussions are designed to ease some of the tensions in the US-China relationship.

The Chinese regime has been shaken by the recent ouster of Bo Xilai, a senior party official, casting a shadow over top changes in the leadership scheduled to take place later this year. Mr. Bo had been a favored candidate for election to the Politburo Standing Committee at the very pinnacle of the Chinese Communist Party.

Hu Jintao is scheduled to step down from the presidency of China later this year, and from the head of the Communist Party in 2013. His likely successor is Vice-President Xi Jinping.

There is, of course, no early prospect of China shedding the communist regime as its ruling party, even though the economy has taken on more and more the character of a free market. But there are some whispers of modest political reform and it remains to be seen whether Mr. Xi will attempt to bring them about.

As for Chen, the most plausible option is for political asylum in the US – though the activist wants to stay in China, with safety guaranteed, to carry on his work.

That Washington and Beijing may settle on a solution unwanted by the dissident himself points out how difficult the balancing act between human rights and other interests can be for the United States – and how far China is from political freedom.

But as long as Chinese citizens like Chen overcome blindness, imprisonment, confinement, and persecution in the cause of freedom, change is ultimately inevitable.

John Hughes is a former editor for the Monitor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Chinese dissident – bad timing for Washington, Beijing
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today