Troubled by the US Supreme Court’s upholding of Trump’s travel ban, Erdoğan’s reelection tilts toward authoritarianism, Why a stable Turkey is important, Ukraine has come a long way since Russia’s invasion, ‘Standard of living’ or ‘standard of life’?

A roundup of global commentary for the July 9, 2018–July 16, 2018 weekly magazine.

Leah Millis/Reuters
Michelle Edralin (second from right), and her sister Nicole Edralin, from New Jersey, react with immigration rights proponents outside the United States Supreme Court after the Court upheld President Trump's travel ban targeting several Muslim-majority countries, Washington, June 26, 2018.

Deutsche Welle / Bonn, Germany

Troubled by the US Supreme Court’s upholding of Trump’s travel ban

“Ever since the Supreme Court ... allowed the third iteration of President Trump’s travel ban to go into effect last December it could be assumed that it would ultimately uphold the controversial move,” writes Michael Knigge. “That the court finally did so on [June 26] therefore does not come as a big surprise. That does not make the Supreme Court’s decision any less troubling. On a practical level it deals a serious blow to the residents of the countries affected by the ban. But more broadly and more importantly, it validates President Trump’s anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim vision as accepted reality – albeit cloaked by national security arguments and the inclusion of two non-Muslim majority countries, North Korea and Venezuela.” 

The Guardian / Sydney, Australia

Erdoğan’s reelection tilts toward authoritarianism

“After winning landmark presidential and parliamentary elections, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has taken a giant step towards one-man rule in Turkey,” states an editorial. “This is an extremely worrying development in the largest Muslim Nato member state.... Mr Erdoğan ... will take up ... vast presidential powers.... He will now control a powerful system of government that abolishes the role of prime minister and shrinks the role of parliament. He can now legislate by decree. The new president and his party control the body that appoints the judiciary.... [Now he] faces incipient economic and diplomatic crises.... Mr Erdoğan has ascended to great heights but that would make a fall all the more dramatic.” 

The Hindu / Chennai, India

Why a stable, democratic, and pluralist Turkey is important

“Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s re-election as President of Turkey comes as no surprise,” states an editorial. “With this, his authoritarian grip will be further consolidated.... The elections were held in a state of emergency, imposed in July 2016 following a coup attempt.... The outcome, which was expected, is a big setback to the secularist Republican People’s Party, the main Opposition. Its candidate, Muharrem İnce, who ended up with 30.7% of the vote compared to Mr. Erdoğan’s 52.6%, had promised to bring back a system of checks and balances over presidential power.... A stable, democratic and pluralist Turkey is essential in a neighbourhood that continues to be blighted by ethnically driven civil wars. As things stand, Mr. Erdoğan’s victory signals another hyper-nationalist, authoritarian turn.” 

EUObserver / Brussels

Ukraine has come a long way since Russia’s invasion

“In 2014 ... a European country ... found itself caught in a make-believe zero-sum game, where outdated principles of spheres of influence and territorial claims incited the Kremlin to use military aggression against a neighboring country...,” write Lars Lokke Rasmussen and Volodymyr Groysman. “[F]our years later, Russian aggression against Ukraine is still ongoing.... Ukraine has come a long way since 2014, not least through the will of the Ukrainian people and its active civil society and with the firm backing of the international community. The government of Ukraine has undertaken remarkable reforms to ensure economic growth, provide effective governance, facilitate human capital development, implement the rule of law and fight corruption.... Ukrainian elections in 2019 will be critical for reforms to proceed.” 

The Jordan Times / Amman, Jordan

Distinguishing between ‘standard of living’ and ‘standard of life’?

“I was intrigued by a short note ... on the social media,” writes Jawad Anani. “The sender of the note emphasised the difference between the standard of living and the standard of life.... The American dream or way of suburban living became as popular in the world as the mighty dollar. Yet, it did not reflect a similarly good standard of life.... The stressful exercise of making household budgets meet monthly payments diminished the happiness, which families were supposed to be enjoying.... We have to bring back the spirit of work where we produce and enjoy things of value like culture, precision, community services and the blessing of voluntary work.... We have to respect life in all its redeeming values in order to live happier.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Troubled by the US Supreme Court’s upholding of Trump’s travel ban, Erdoğan’s reelection tilts toward authoritarianism, Why a stable Turkey is impo...
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Global-Newsstand/2018/0714/Troubled-by-the-US-Supreme-Court-s-upholding-of-Trump-s-travel-ban-Erdogan-s-reelection-tilts-toward-authoritarianism-Why-a-stable-Turkey-is-important-Ukraine-has-come-a-long-way-since-Russia-s-invasion-Standard-of-living-or-standard-of-life
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe