Why desegregation matters

Separateness can be beautiful, expressed in distinct cultures, traditions, and nations. But when the Supreme Court declared in 1954 that “Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal,” it touched on a truth.

Melanie Stetson Freeman/Staff
School buses line up outside Waterfront Elementary School in Buffalo, N.Y. City Hall is in the background.

For the 13 years she went to public school in Buffalo, N.Y., Monitor staff writer Stacy Teicher Khadaroo got a different picture of her hometown.

To many of the adults around her, Buffalo was one of the more segregated cities in the United States. As in many other cities, there was a “wrong side of the tracks” – places where some residents wouldn’t go, places where others couldn’t. But to Stacy, there were just friends, some white, some black, some from one side of town, some from the other. Her Buffalo was a product of the city’s pioneering efforts to desegregate its schools.

Today, those schools have resegregated, and the story of Stacy’s hometown is in many ways the story of the nation. From blue/red to black/white, the US is struggling to come to terms with segregation in various forms. School segregation is just a symptom of the broader condition. But to understand that broader condition, it’s a good place to start.

School desegregation did not come easily. It took the Supreme Court’s landmark Brown v. Board of Education ruling and the deployment of the 101st Airborne Division in Little Rock, Ark., for a start. Then it took busing, redistricting, and civil rights laws to reach a point – somewhere in the 1990s – when US public schools could say they had made significant headway toward ending segregation. 

Then it crumbled.

Why? The commitment to it waned. White flight kept America segregated, and many of the guardrails put in place to maintain school desegregation were allowed to atrophy or were actively targeted in lawsuits. Desegregation was seen as too hard or not important enough. Busing was controversial. Redistricting was complicated. Civil rights laws impinged on local authority.

Buffalo raises the possibility that desegregation, if not enforced, doesn’t happen. School resegregation, after all, is largely a product of the fact that Americans live in segregated communities, the result of sorting themselves along economic and racial lines. Recent voting patterns have shown that Americans are increasingly segregating ideologically, too. 

Segregation matters because it limits opportunity. In their purest form, economies take no account of race, creed, or sex. Economies want opportunity to spread widely. As that happens, growth occurs. That happened nationwide, Stacy notes. “African-Americans who attended integrated schools in the US in the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80s had better outcomes than those who did not, and the benefits persisted among their children and grandchildren.” Among the benefits: higher educational attainment, increased earnings by one-third, and large reductions in the incidence of poverty and incarceration.

Segregation also matters because it influences how we see our world. Separateness can be beautiful, expressed in distinct cultures, traditions, and nations. But when the Supreme Court declared in 1954 that “Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal,” it touched on a truth. The struggle to continually find a new and deeper sense of unity is never easy, but the reward, history repeatedly shows, is expanded wealth and well-being for all.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.