The courage of cause, the ease of effect

The Western world is undergoing a fundamental change in its economic structure. The jobs that once sustained the Western working class are disappearing and evolving into new forms, and too many Western workers are not keeping up.

Juan Ignacio Llana/Special to The Christian Science Monitor
Students at the Salesianos De Deusto Vocational School in Bilbao, Spain, take part in a robotics and automation workshop.

So often and so easily, politics mistakes effects for causes. Effects, after all, are easier to spot and easier to denounce. They are in your face. Causes are more subtle, hidden in the gray shades of countless past choices. Addressing them is invariably messy and complicated and requires some measure of compromise. Politics cannot be done at the drive-through window.

All of which makes Sara Miller ­Llana’s cover story this week of the utmost importance.

Today, the West is struggling to cope with a deep emotional angst among its working classes. There are other factors, too, behind “Brexit,” the rise of American hyperpolarization, the unparalleled success of France’s Marine Le Pen, and the growth of populist movements in Germany, Poland, Hungary, and elsewhere. But a common thread is a sense that a new class of elites is today’s winner, and it is most interested in helping disaffected minorities. Everyone else is getting left behind.

It is easy just to stop there. The tremendous political change this trend has wrought in the past few years is enough to feed 100 CNNs. In its populist incarnations, the trend appears to threaten the values that have undergirded Western social order since World War II – values such as cultural and economic openness and centrism. 

Yet all the while, in the United States at least, one of the core questions continues to go almost entirely unaddressed.

Why are so many people so scared and frustrated? What is the cause?

One crucial answer is as seismic as the effects we see on our television sets and Twitter feeds. The Western world is undergoing a fundamental change in its economic structure, Sara writes in her cover story. The jobs that once sustained the Western working class are disappearing and evolving into new forms, and too many Western workers are not keeping up.

As these workers fall further behind, remaining unemployed for months or years at a time, the effect is a corrosion of hope.

“[W]ork is about much more than production, economic growth, and dollars and cents,” writes Michael Strain, a conservative economist. “Work harnesses our passions by channeling them to productive ends. Work gives us a sense of identity, a sense of purpose, and allows us to provide for those we love. Our unemployment crisis is therefore also a moral and spiritual crisis – a human crisis.”

Mr. Strain sees a role for some targeted economic stimulus, along with creative thinking about the minimum wage, tax credits, and flexible work arrangements. The European countries profiled in the cover story see a larger government role in ensuring a safety net and retraining for workers cast off by the new economy.

The real need is to address the sense of helplessness and lack of self-worth that a job so often remedies. The policies are less important than the commitment to addressing the need. That begins with the courage to identify and honestly address causes, however difficult that might be, rather than remain in the caffeinated spin cycle of effects.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.