Quality child care: what’s at stake

Child care in today's economy is a problem with millions of patchwork solutions, many far from ideal. Can we do better for kids and parents?


Most of us check the gauges of the economy from time to time to decide how to save, invest, or borrow. Weather forecasts give us clues about how to dress, and traffic updates about what routes to drive or trains to catch. Police reports and real estate transactions indicate how our communities are doing. And there’s a burgeoning market for personal health data that companies such as Nike and Apple have staked out with wearable devices that track everything from heart rates to steps taken to calories burned.

Metrics make us feel as though we understand and control our world. “What’s measured improves,” management guru Peter Drucker declared. Using metrics is better than winging it, even if they are just the latest, technologically improved version of putting a dipstick into an oil reservoir. We understand a slice of life but not life itself. How do we measure the most important things: the health of families, the development of children, the quality of the world we are handing down to the next generation?

In a Monitor cover story, Stephanie Hanes examines the problem of child care in the United States in the 21st century (click here to read it). Here’s the basic issue, which you might be in the thick of: Gender, ethnicity, and almost all economic backgrounds notwithstanding, almost every parent has to work – for financial survival, for purpose, and for protection. With so many marriages still ending in divorce, a career is often a hedge against uncertainty.

But if we are just living for ourselves – within the sometimes interesting, sometimes challenging spans of careers and lifetimes – we are giving short shrift to the future. How we care for, encourage, and educate children is crucial to how civilization goes forward. No matter what challenges adults face in today’s economy, child care amplifies that challenge. Children crave attention. How does that square with a work environment in which men and women are expected to shut out their personal lives for the good of the organization? 

The cost, stress, and missed opportunities from the patchwork of child-care options – a quick drop-off with Mom or a neighbor, a rushed delivery to preschool, long periods when kids are left to their own devices – have consequences for children, parents, and communities. There’s hope, however. Stephanie reports on new approaches that allow children to be near a workplace but also allow mothers and fathers to do their jobs without too much interference. While these are promising innovations, they are only marginal ways so far of solving a society-wide problem.

You might believe that companies could offer parents more flexibility or that governments could do more to help parents cope. You might believe that the decision to have children requires awareness of the complications and responsibilities that come with them. Whatever the case, children arrive and immediately need to be nurtured, taught, encouraged, and corrected. Parents need help so they can be the primary nurturers, teachers, encouragers, and correctors. That’s not just one family’s challenge. The quality of care children get today determines the quality of humanity’s future.

John Yemma can be reached at yemma@csmonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.