Single-minded prayer

A Christian Science perspective: When multi-tasking is ineffective.

Those who like to cook while watching TV, or respond to e-mails while taking phone calls, might have been surprised by the results of a study on multi-tasking released earlier this year. The two major findings from the University of Utah study could be summed up as follows: (1) People aren’t really very good at doing two or more tasks at once, and (2) somewhat paradoxically, those who chronically multi-task (and consider themselves adept at juggling assignments) are actually the most distracted overall (Nancy Shute, “If You Think You’re Good at Multitasking, You Probably Aren’t,”, Jan. 24).

Most of us wouldn’t think of prayer as a “task” like driving or washing dishes – yet it’s still a discipline, an activity that must be managed against other constraints on our time. For those who consider quiet communion with God as one of their top priorities, insights into the pitfalls of multi-tasking might offer some lessons.

Doesn’t the multi-tasking study point to the conclusion that, for whatever portion of the day we choose to devote to it, prayer deserves our complete attention? Distracted prayer isn’t likely to be very effective, just as distracted driving isn’t likely to be very safe. And when our attention is flipping back and forth between prayer and other demands (or even entertainment), we’re probably not hearing God’s direction as clearly as we could be.

It’s natural for each of us to want to pray deeply, honestly, and undistractedly because we reflect God, who is divine Principle. In fact, prayer itself involves affirming the presence and activity of Principle in our own thinking. In prayer, we insist that we’re not subject to a chaotic material scene but governed by divine laws of goodness, and that as we perceive this goodness more clearly in our thoughts, we’ll see it more clearly in our experience through relationships strengthened, safety upheld, supply found. Why shouldn’t we feel drawn to give this kind of prayerful affirmation our full attention?

Much has been written about how Jesus devoted himself to prayer, often going off alone to commune with God (see for example: Luke 5:16, Mark 6:46). Jesus could have chosen a constant multi-tasking approach to his ministry – there was no shortage of people clamoring for him to heal them and preach to them – but instead he devoted long stretches of time to nourishing his connection with his Father. Jesus demonstrated that when it’s not held hostage to other demands on our time, consecrated prayer allows us to do the most effective healing work imaginable.

Mary Baker Eddy, who discovered Christian Science, underscores this sentiment with a reminder that “to understand God is the work of eternity, and demands absolute consecration of thought, energy, and desire” (“Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures,” p. 3). Our daily routines, rather than being hurried and pressured with competing obligations and distractions, can reflect a measure of the balance that’s inescapably part of our spiritual makeup.

From an editorial in the Christian Science Sentinel.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Single-minded prayer
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today