How immigration helps the US economy: Report

Researchers found little evidence that immigration significantly affects the overall employment levels of native-born workers.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP/File
Immigration activists demonstrate in March 2016 at the Supreme Court in Washington in support of President Obama's executive order to grant relief from deportation, to keep immigrant families together. A new, comprehensive report from the National Academies finds that immigration benefits the US economy overall.

Contrary to popular belief, immigration has benefited the US economy and had little effect on the overall wage gap and job market, according to a report by the The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine.

The report updates a 1997 document that detailed the fiscal effects of the 40 million immigrants on the US economy and labor market. The update comes at a time when immigration has come to the forefront of political thought and has become a decisive issue in the presidential election.

When looking at the big picture, the researchers found "little evidence that immigration significantly affects the overall employment levels of native-born workers."

"Immigration enlarges the economy while leaving the native population slightly better off on average," they wrote, "but the greatest beneficiaries of immigration are the immigrants themselves as they avail themselves of opportunities not available to them in their home countries."

While compiling the report, they struggled with gaps in immigration data that made it difficult to distinguish between documented and undocumented immigrants and the effects those groups have on the economic climate. But despite the missing data, the report is the most comprehensive study of its kind.

Yes, they said, an immigration-fueled increase in lower skilled workers can depress wages for other groups of lower-skilled workers, such as previous waves of immigrants, high school dropouts, or teenagers looking for a summer job. However, the effect more often translates into fewer hours for employees than lower wages or less employment.

Additionally, an increasing number of immigrants are highly skilled workers with college degrees and skills that benefit the economy through innovation and entrepreneurship and actually drive up wages and job opportunities for immigrants and native-born citizens, they found. Additionally, second-generation immigrants – people born in the US to foreign-born parents – contribute to the economy as taxpayers and workers.

"The prospects for long run economic growth in the United States would be considerably dimmed without the contributions of high-skilled immigrants," the researchers wrote.

But while immigration has benefited the nation as a whole, the report noted, some areas face increased challenges. Over the next 75 years, the researchers predict, the economic impact of immigration will be "generally positive at the federal level and negative at the state and local levels," due to strain on government resources and programs.

Pia Orrenius, a senior economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and a member of the panel that wrote the report, told the Dallas Morning News that using the short-term negative impact to cut funding for schools or other programs that immigrants tend to take advantage of would be foolish, since having an educated workforce is necessary for long-term economic growth.

If anything, she said, "it argues for having a really good immigration policy," so that the labor force can be even stronger in the future.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.