Looking for a new job? Move here.

The US job market has improved, but some parts of the country are much, much better than others for prospective job seekers, according to a new study. Texas cities dominate the list of the best US cities for job seekers in 2015, but a university town in the Midwest came out on top.

Eric Gay/AP/File
The dome of the Texas State Capital peeks through trees in Austin, Texas. Based on low unemployment and cost of living in several of its cities, the Lone Star state is among the best states for job seekers, according to an analysis released Monday, Jan. 12, 2014.

All told, the US job market is in relatively good shape right now –  the national unemployment rate dropped to 5.6 percent last month, and the economy gained back all of the jobs it lost during the Great Recession months ago. But for workers still looking to land great new jobs, not all parts of the country are created equal, according to a study released Monday by NerdWallet.

The personal finance website analyzed employment rate, cost of living, income level, and population growth in 100 US cities. According to the results, Lincoln, Neb., is the best city for employment seekers in the country. In addition to a 2.3 percent unemployment rate, Lincoln boasts a low cost of living (residents pay a median $722 a month in rent) and major employers, including the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, BNSF Railway, and several major medical centers. 

Texas, meanwhile, was the top state for jobseekers, boasting six cities among the top 20: Fort Worth, Austin, Laredo, Corpus Christi, Lubbock, and Irving.

The study ranked cities based on a combination of employment rates, median incomes, cost of living (as measured by median monthly rent payments), and growth of the working age population over the last five years. Cities in the middle of the country tended to rank high; college towns, including Columbus, Ohio and Austin, Texas, also fared well.

via NerdWallet

On the flip side, coastal cities, with their high costs of living and low population growth (because there are already so many people living there), didn’t fare well. “It was initially somewhat surprising to see just how poorly cities in California did,” Sreekar Jashri, the analyst who compiled the data, wrote via e-mail. “Fremont is the highest city from the state on our list at 26th, while San Francisco ranked 44th. Diving further into the numbers, though, it becomes clear why these cities aren't higher – the workforce growth in many of these places isn't as high and while income levels tend to be higher in California's cities, affordability is also much lower." 

Job prospects, of course, aren’t the only reasons Americans relocate. But there’s growing evidence that workers, especially young ones, are letting economic factors like employment and cost of living determine where they end up, and that has potential to change the population makeup of the country overall. For example, 2013 migration data from the US Census found that California and New York – historically two of the most popular landing spots for people moving from one state to another – ranked last in terms of state-by-state migrations. “States and cities that have typically been popular in past decades aren't necessarily as lucrative for job seekers any more, while places that are home to stronger local economies have become more attractive," Mr. Jashri writes.  

For the full city rankings and details on methodology, visit the NerdWallet study here.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.