Marriage and finances: Making both voices heard

In most marriages, one spouse is the primary handler of family finances. This works to an extent, but relying solely on one spouse can increase financial risk. Both partners should be involved in financial decisions, Hamm explains.  

Carlos Osorio/AP Photo/File
Neta Homier looks over bills in her home in Toledo, Ohio. Hamm warns of the risks the come from having one spouse solely responsible for financial decisions and instead recommends both partners be involved.

In most marriages, one spouse is the primary handler of the personal finance mechanisms. In my family, it’s me. With my parents, it’s my mother.

That person usually is the one who makes the trips to the bank, makes sure the bills are paid, reads through the bills when they come in, and lots of other little tasks like that.

In our marriage, at least, we talk about virtually every decision we make, but I usually take care of the implementation of those decisions. The same thing is true, more or less, for my parents.

In terms of functionally achieving things, this works really well. However, in terms of actually making decisions, this setup makes it very easy for one person to just simply take control of many personal finance decisions

At the same time, it’s really easy for the other partner to just allow it to happen and relinquish control and input over a lot of financial decisions. It’s easier and it relieves them of the effort of understanding and figuring out things.

For both partners, this is a mistake for several reasons.

For one, an involved partner can ensure that their voice is a part of the decisions. It’s really easy for the more financially involved partner to shape things to be more in line with that partner’s financial goals and values, whether unconsciously or not. A good marriage is about compromise, and compromise means not having everything exactly how you want it to be, but when you’re in control of the actual implementation of a compromise, it can be very easy to skew things a bit toward your own vision, whether you realize it or not. An involved partner can prevent that from happening.

For another, an involved partner provides a valuable “check” on the decisions and moves of the more active partner. While the active partner might generally be making really good moves, there’s always the chance for a poor decision or a mis-step or an oversight of some kind. A second set of eyeballs and thought processes never hurts when it comes to the financial decisions of your family.

For yet another, a partner uninvolved in the family’s finances will be completely lost if the other partner can’t fulfill those duties. A partner who is unaware of the financial institutions used by the family, where the checkbook is kept, what bills are due each month, where and how the files are stored, and so on is going to be in deep trouble if all of these processes are dumped on that person at once.

Of course, being involved requires additional effort. Often, it means learning things, like what the general difference between an IRA and a 401(k) is and what banks you do business with.

More importantly, it means having regular financial chats with your spouse. This is something I think is a valuable part of a marriage anyway, but the fact that it keeps both members in the loop financially is just another benefit of regular financial discussions.

What should they entail? First and foremost, such discussions should be about goals, particularly in terms of talking about the goals each partner has individually and making sure that all shared goals are still moving forward and still reflect what both partners desire. They’re also useful for reviewing the family’s spending. Are we collectively meeting the family’s budget? Are we in agreement as to any major upcoming purchases?

For Sarah and myself, these discussions are pretty casual and pretty frequent. Scarcely a week goes by without one of these topics coming up naturally as part of our conversation – and the same is largely true of my parents, who I’m most familiar with. Still, I’m quite aware from reader mailbags that this isn’t true of quite a few couples out there, and I consider it an essential part of marriage.

A final piece of the puzzle: both partners should be involved with the creation, maintenance, and storage of a master information document, one that lists all accounts and account information along with contact information for all of those institutions. This is a vital thing to have in the aftermath of a family disaster. There are a lot of formats for this, but a simple word processor document can easily hold all of this information. Just make sure that you have at least one copy stored in a secure off-site place.

Relying on your spouse to just “figure it out” puts you at great financial risk, even without any missteps from your partner. Everyone needs to be involved in their financial future and know what to do in the event of an emergency. Without that knowledge, you’re simply making a potential life crisis far worse than it otherwise could have been while also increasing the chance that your finances aren’t really working for you.

The post Relying on Your Spouse to Figure It Out appeared first on The Simple Dollar.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Marriage and finances: Making both voices heard
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today