Converting time into money

The time you spend at home on frugal tasks directly converts into money saved, Hamm writes.

Valentin Flauraud/Reuters/File
An employee poses with a Patek Philippe wristwatch from the collection of musician Eric Clapton during an auction preview at Christie's in Geneva in this November 2012 file photo. A frugal task that cuts your expenses by a certain amount is just as good as working for that money, Hamm writes.

What is an hour of your time and energy worth?

In simplest terms, an hour of your time is worth whatever you’re paid for an hour’s worth of work at your job. After all, you’re repeatedly willing to spend your time and energy at that rate, so it must be an exchange rate you’re happy with.

In fact, that’s a pretty good metric to apply to the rest of the time that you have. If there’s a frugality tactic that can earn you a better hourly rate than what you make at work, why wouldn’t you do it?

Here’s an example of what I’m talking about. Let’s say I can make a batch of laundry detergent in fifteen minutes that, after expenses, saves me $6 over the store brand. Since I need laundry detergent, I end up saving about $24 for every hour of my effort. 

Another example is making bulk meals in advance. If a meal costs me $6 to assemble, but if I assemble four at once, it costs me only $5 per meal, resulting in the extra time I spend assembling them saves me $3. It might take me an extra half an hour to do it, but it’s an even better deal because I’ll get the time back later when I have easy-to-prepare meals in the freezer.

You can make comparisons like this with almost any frugal task you take on.

If you find that preparing a grocery list saves you an average of $20 per grocery store visit – which is a reasonable amount for a well-considered grocery list to save you – and it takes 45 minutes to prepare it, then you’re saving $26.67 per hour spent assembling grocery lists.

If you spend an hour making your own homemade dry soup mixes that cost two dollars less per mix than the ones at the store, but you make twenty of them – enough for the whole winter – you’re saving $40 per hour.

The time you spend at home on frugal tasks directly converts into money saved. It’s a direct conversion, one with an hourly rate you can calculate if you keep track of the time invested and the money saved on the item.

For me, I shoot for an hourly rate of $10 to $15 (depending on the task) when I’m doing something by myself, or a rate of $5 if it’s an activity I can do with the kids. I’ll usually try an activity once and calculate the hourly rate of my savings and if it’s around the $10 mark (or around the $5 mark if I can do it with the kids), I’ll make sure to keep it in the repertoire.

Do this calculation regularly, and you’ll also find yourself with a useful tool for deciding if a new frugal activity is worthwhile enough for you. If you’re just not saving much money for an hour’s worth of effort, there’s almost assuredly a better way to spend that hour.

A frugal task that cuts your expenses by a certain amount is just as good as working for that money – or, arguably, better since you don’t have to pay taxes on the money you save with frugality. Calculate up how much you save for a task, compare it to what you earn at work, and you might have yourself a new appreciation for frugality.

This post is part of a yearlong series called “365 Ways to Live Cheap (Revisited),” in which I’m revisiting the entries from my book “365 Ways to Live Cheap,” which is available at Amazon and at bookstores everywhere. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.