Investors walk away from mutual funds, leaving billions on the table

Over the last several years investors have abandoned roughly $65 billion in gains by walking away from their equity mutual funds.

Richard Drew/AP
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange Friday. Brown cites data from ConvergEx showing that investors in U.S. stock mutual funds have withdrawn $347.2 billion over the past three years.

Josh here - Nick Colas, Chief Market Strategist at ConvergEx, calculates that investors have left roughly $65 billion in gains on the table by walking away from their equity mutual funds over the last several years.  This is offset by the fact that they may have simply switched some of the money into bond funds, of course.  Even still, pulling $347 billion from stock funds over three years seems like a lot until you consider that they are still holding $5.6 trillion worth.

Some interesting stats from the ConvergEx team below...
***

  • Since August 2009, the S&P 500 is up 39.6%. It has had some pullbacks, to be sure, such as the drops in mid-2010, late 2011, and mid-2012. But if you had entered the market on August 28th, 2009 you would not have experienced a loss on your initial investment except for one week in July 2010.
  • Over the same period, investors in U.S. stock mutual funds have withdrawn $347.2 billion. The outflows have been persistent to the point of monotonous. Only six of the last 36 months have seen net inflows, the last one in April 2011. The average net monthly outflow has been $9.6 billion.
  • The period from January 2007 to July 2009 was almost as bad, with $204.3 billion leaving U.S. stock funds. Yet the flows were not as persistent negative during this period, the worst for domestic stock volatility. Of the 31 months in this period, 10 of them actually saw inflows.
  • There are several reasons, in my opinion, for the move out of U.S. stocks funds. Investors have clearly shifted to less-risky investments, a in a moment. There is also likely a demographic aspect to these flows, as recent retirees juggle their portfolios for incremental income rather than outright growth. An estimated half of U.S. stock fund assets sit inside defined-contribution plans such as 401(k)s, after all. And lastly, I am sympathetic to the notion that structure still dealing with some very visible teething pains.
  • Exchange Traded Funds now offer investors a competing product to mutual funds, and flows into U.S equity ETFs over the last 3 years amounts to some $93.9 billion according to our friends at www.xtf.com. The fact that ETFs are not widely used in defined contribution plans means that these flows may not be the destination of the money that has left mutual funds, however. In fact, we've spoken to ETF sponsors who posit that ETF investors represent a younger demographic than mutual fund holders and therefore the two pools of money have origins in different rivers of capital.

***
Good stuff.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.