Here are the nuts and bolts of the GOP health plan

In addition to major revisions to Medicaid and other parts of the health care system, the new American Health Care Act proposes a number of changes to tax law. Here's what they are.

Susan Walsh/AP
House Speaker Paul Ryan takes his notes as he and House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-California, walk away following a news conference on the American Health Care Act on Capitol Hill in Washington.

On Monday, House Republicans introduced legislation to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).  In addition to major revisions to Medicaid and other parts of the health care system, the American Health Care Act proposes a number of changes to tax law, including repealing nearly all ACA taxes; delaying implementation of the excise tax on high-cost health plans (the so-called “Cadillac tax”); replacing the existing premium tax credit with a new refundable health insurance credit; and enhancing Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). 

Many of the provisions would repeal taxes on high-income households enacted during the Obama administration. To date the congressional Joint Tax Committee has only scored a subset of the revenue provisions so the total impact on revenues is not yet known.  Additionally, CBO has yet to estimate the impact on outlays or health insurance coverage.

The ACA made several changes to the tax code intended to increase health insurance coverage, reduce health care costs, and finance health care reform.  The American Health Care Act repeals nearly all those tax changes including:

  • An additional 0.9 percent payroll tax on earnings and a 3.8 percent tax on net investment income (NII) for individuals with incomes exceeding $200,000 and couples with incomes exceeding $250,000. Nearly all families affected by the additional payroll and investment taxes are in the top 5 percent of income, with most of the burden borne by families in the top 1 percent of income.  JCT estimates repealing these two taxes would cost $275 billion over ten years.
  • The Premium Tax Credit (PTC), a refundable tax credit to help families purchase health insurance through state and federal marketplaces. To qualify, tax filers must have incomes between 100 and 400 percent of the federal poverty level and be ineligible for health coverage from other sources (such as Medicaid or affordable employer-sponsored insurance).  The PTC primarily benefits low- and moderate-income families. 
  • Penalty taxes on individuals without adequate health insurance coverage and employers with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees who do not offer adequate health insurance coverage to their employees. These individual and employer mandate taxes, which were created to encourage people to get insurance coverage, disproportionately affect low- and moderate-income families who are more likely to lack insurance.
  • Excise taxes on health insurance providers, pharmaceutical manufacturers and importers, and medical device manufacturers and importers. These excise taxes have a similar percentage impact on after-tax incomes for families across the income distribution.  JCT estimates repealing them would cost $190 billion over ten years.

The House GOP bill would also repeal the small employer health insurance credit, loosen limits on the medical expense itemized deduction, loosen constraints on medical flexible spending accounts, and repeal the excise tax on indoor tanning.

The plan would delay implementation of the ACA’s excise tax on high-cost health plans from 2020 to 2025.  The so-called Cadillac tax is assessed on high-value employer-sponsored health benefits. Because the thresholds are only indexed to general price inflation, more plans would be affected over time.   Middle-income and upper income families would be hit the hardest by the Cadillac tax.  JCT projects delaying the tax until 2025 will cost nearly $50 billion over ten years.

Additionally, the plan replaces the Premium Tax Credit with a new refundable health insurance credit for individuals without public or employer-provided coverage.  The full amount of the new credit varies by age, ranging from $2,000 for those under age 30 to $4,000 for those over age 60.  The credit is capped at $14,000 per family and phases out when income exceeds $75,000 ($150,000 for joint filers).  Relative to the current Premium Tax Credit, which limits family contributions as percent of income and phases out entirely when income exceeds 400% of the federal poverty line, the new credit is less generous towards lower income families.

The bill also increases contribution limits to Health Savings Accounts (HSA), which allow families with certain high-deductible health plans to save tax-free for out-of-pocket medical expenses.  Both individuals and employers can contribute to HSAs.  The proposal raises contribution limits from $3,400 to $6,550 for individuals and from $6,750 to $13,100 for families.  It also reduces the penalty on withdrawals for non-qualified expenses and reverses the ACA’s prohibition on using HSA funds (and flexible spending accounts) to purchase over-the-counter medications.  These changes likely benefit high-wage workers more than others as they are more able to save and more likely to be constrained by current contribution limits.

The American Health Care Act is an ambitious plan to repeal and replace the ACA that includes a number of changes in tax policy.  We plan to further assess the cost and distributional effects of the proposal shortly.   

This story originally appeared on TaxVox.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Here are the nuts and bolts of the GOP health plan
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today