Promised delays of federal tax refunds have delayed filing, too

February 15 was the first day those who claim either the EITC or the ACTC could have received their 2016 tax refunds. This is several weeks later than in past years.

Susan Walsh/AP/File
The Internal Revenue Service building in located in Washington, DC.

February 15 could have been a big day for many low- and moderate-income families. It was the first day those who claim either an earned income tax credit (EITC) or the refundable portion of the child tax credit (the additional child tax credit, or ACTC) should have started to receive their 2016 tax refunds. This is several weeks later than in past years – time that could be costly for cash-strapped families who often rely on getting refunds sooner.

Recently released IRS data shows that fewer people filed returns early this year and that the average refunds dropped almost in half relative to recent years – signs that point to filing delays by people claiming EITCs and ACTCs (filers who typically file early and qualify for relatively large refunds). Congress mandated the delay when it passed the Protection Americans From Tax Hikes Act of 2015.

Congress slowed refunds to reduce fraud. The delay was intended to give IRS time to verify income on EITC and ACTC returns since employer’s are now required to file information returns by January 31 (previously they had until March

While we don’t know if the delay did reduce fraud, it may have discouraged people from filing their tax returns early. As of Feb. 3, only 20 million returns were filed, compared to about 27 million in each of the three prior years.  The IRS attributed this, in part, to fewer days in the 2016 filing season compared to the 2015.

Since fewer returns were filed, the IRS processed fewer refunds. By the first week of February, the agency had processed 6.6 million refunds, compared to over 17 million in each of the prior three years. Refunds were also much smaller in this early period than in the past – averaging just under $2,000, compared to about $3,300. IRS attributed both of these facts to the delayed EITC and ACTC refunds.

EITC and ACTC filers have a strong incentive to file their tax returns early in the filing season since they  can represent a very significant source of revenue  for many low-income families.

That’s why delaying these refunds could increase their economic hardship. In a small survey of low-income tax returns (the Household Financial Survey), almost 80 percent of EITC and CTC filers with children who filed their returns early in the season reported high levels of material hardship. Almost 60 percent skipped a bill in the past six months, almost 40 percent skipped necessary dental care, and almost 40 percent could not afford the type or amount of food they needed.

Congress could have adopted other fraud reduction measures that would have been less burdensome to low-income families, such as regulating return preparers and adequately funding the IRS. Perhaps lawmakers could reconsider some of these other solutions.

This story originally appeared on TaxVox.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.