Most Americans pay more payroll tax than income tax

In terms of how much tax they pay, people should worry more about the payroll taxes their employers withhold from every paycheck. 

Mary Altaffer/AP/File
McDonald's employees serve a meal in New York in this file photo.

Americans agonize each spring over their annual federal income tax returns. In terms of how much tax they pay, however, they should worry more about the payroll taxes their employers withhold from every paycheck. After all, three-quarters of those who pay one or both taxes shell out more for payroll taxes than for income tax.

The Tax Policy Center estimates that 44 percent of households will pay no federal income tax this year (down from the 47 percent famously cited by Mitt Romney in 2012). But 60 percent of those households have members who work and will thus pay Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes. As the light blue block shows, that’s about one-quarter of all households.

Nearly half of all households will pay both income and payroll taxes (the dark yellow and dark blue blocks). Almost three-fourths of them will pay more in payroll taxes than in income taxes. Just 7 percent of households (the light yellow block) will owe income tax but no payroll tax because they don’t have any wage income.

Tax Policy Center, Distribution of Federal Payroll and Income Taxes by Expanded Cash Income Percentile, 2016

Overall, almost two-thirds of households will pay more payroll tax than income tax (the two blue blocks), while only one in five will pay more income tax (the two yellow blocks).

And what about the remaining 18 percent who pay neither tax? More than half are retirees living on Social Security and too little other income to owe income tax. The rest have no jobs and not much income. That isn’t a club many would want to join.

This story originally appeared on TaxVox.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.