Most state budgets show improvement but uncertain futures

Things should be looking up for most states, but state budgets and their futures look increasingly uncertain. 

Gerry Broome/AP/File
Members of the North Carolina House conduct business at the General Assembly in Raleigh, N.C., Thursday, Sept. 17, 2015.

If you are not an energy dependent state, things ought to be pretty good, at least in the short-term. The economy is improving, though slowly, The Rockefeller Institute reported this morning that state tax revenues grew by 5.8 percent in the first quarter of this year and by 7.6 percent in the second quarter.

But for many states, the fiscal outlook is not great. Lawmakers in Illinois and Pennsylvania can’t even agree on their respective budgets. Kansas is struggling with severe fiscal constraints after draining its coffers by slashing taxes. In the longer term, demographics, technology, and an increasingly unreliable federal partner raise questions about fiscal sustainability.

At a Tax Policy Center State and Local Finance Initiative panel this afternoon, a group of budget experts debated the long- and short-term fiscal prospects for the states. Panelists included SLFI director Kim Rueben; National Governors Association deputy director David Quam; Center on Budget and Policy Priorities senior vice president for state fiscal policy Nick Johnson; Tax Foundation vice president for legal and state  projects Joseph Henchman; and Ryan King, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute’s Justice Policy Center.

In some cases, state problems are partly of their own making. For instance, several states are cutting income taxes, forcing them to rely increasingly on sales taxes. But the sales tax base has eroded sharply as consumption has shifted from taxable goods to untaxed services. Yet most have been unwilling to take the politically difficult—but fiscally sensible-- step of significantly broadening their sales tax bases. And they are still limited in their ability to require online retailers to collect sales taxes.

new paper by my TPC colleagues Norton Francis and Frank Sammartino notes that since 1998 online sales have boomed. Yet, many of those transactions still go untaxed. Instead of broadening the tax base, Norton and Frank report that 38 of the 45 states with a sales tax raised rates over the past three decades. Only three lowered rates. Raising rates on a shrinking tax base is not a model for fiscal success.

On other issues, states are not standing pat. For instance, faced with an unending series of temporary highway funding bills from Congress, some states are exploring new options. Oregon has adopted a creative new design for a mileage-based gas tax. Other states are partnering with private developers to build new roads.

And states are fundamentally rethinking the way they address criminal justice and incarceration. As Ryan noted, there is a growing consensus that long prison sentences may not be the best way to cut crime though lawmakers still differ on the best alternatives.

Today’s decent economy gives states a chance to build up reserves for the inevitable next downturn, reform their tax systems, and rethink how they spend taxpayer money. Unfortunately, many states are mired in ideological battles or unwilling to confront entrenched interests. In a few years, we may look back at 2015 as (yet another) missed opportunity for state government.

The post Most State Budgets Are Improving But Their Long-Term Prospects Remain Uncertain appeared first on TaxVox.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.