Will immigrants get a tax windfall from refundable credits?

Lawmakers scuttled an effort to permanently extend a number of tax breaks—largely because many feared it would open the door to widespread use of refundable tax credits by undocumented immigrants covered by President Obama’s recent executive order. Is their concern justified?

Reuters/Larry Downing/File
Sen. Richard Blumenthal stands next to Jong-Min You and Sen. Dick Durbin as he speaks about immigration reform in Washington,December 10, 2014.

In the end-of-the-year congressional scramble, lawmakers scuttled an effort to permanently extend a number of tax breaks—largely because many feared it would open the door to widespread use of refundable tax credits by undocumented immigrants covered by President Obama’s recent executive order.  But is their concern justified?

Three sets of rules related to residency and citizenship govern eligibility for the three primary tax benefits for families with children – the dependent exemption, the Child Tax Credit (CTC), and the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). President Obama’s recent executive action will allow some parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents who have been in the country for at least five years to apply for limited work authorization. His initiative will not affect the dependent exemption or CTC but it will increase the number of parents who meet the citizenship and residency requirements for the EITC.

As background, the IRS doesn’t care what your legal status is—if you work in the United States and meet minimum income standards, you are legally required to file a tax return. To facilitate filing, the IRS assigns an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) to anyone who is not eligible to obtain a Social Security Number (SSN).

The dependent exemption has the most liberal eligibility requirements. If you have an ITIN and are the parent of a U.S. citizen child who lives with you in the U.S., Mexico, or Canada, your child qualifies. The same tests apply to the CTC (including the Additional Child Tax Credit—ACTC—which is the refundable portion of the CTC), except both parent and child must live in the U.S. EITC rules are most restrictive: The taxpayer and child must live in the U.S. and the taxpayer must have a Social Security number valid for work.

The Treasury Inspector General of Tax Administration (TIGTA) has insisted that children should meet the stricter EITC requirements to qualify for the ACTC. But that’s not how the IRS has interpreted the statute. Congress has routinely failed to pass legislation aimed at requiring SSNs to claim the ACTC (including in the most recent Congress).

It is unclear how many people granted work permits under the recent executive action will qualify for the EITC. But keep in mind that lawmakers of both parties often praise the EITC for encouraging work and reducing poverty. In addition, it usually serves as only a short-term benefit for recipients. The EITC, in conjunction with the CTC and the dependent exemption that these immigrants can already receive, can provide an important source of support for low-income families – but the executive action isn’t the major policy shift the critics claim it to be.

The post Will Immigrants Get A Tax Windfall From Refundable Credits? appeared first on TaxVox.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Will immigrants get a tax windfall from refundable credits?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today