Estate tax up in the air. Is the time to give now?

Wealthy people might do well to consider being very generous this month and giving very large gifts at today’s bargain tax prices, Williams writes.

Seth Perlman/AP/File
A 2011 1040 tax form along with other income tax forms are seen at the entrance of the Illinois Department of Revenue in this April 2012 in Springfield, Ill. Congress once again has to decide what to do about estate and gift taxes, Williams writes.

For over a decade, the federal estate and gift tax has been in constant flux with its exemption rising, its rates falling, and its near-death experience in 2010 followed by resurrection in a reduced state. Now Congress once again has to decide what to do about these levies, which affect relatively few taxpayers but get an inordinate amount of attention. Calling something the “death tax” will do that.

For a few more weeks, the estate and gift tax exempts $5 million of gifts or bequests and taxes any excess at 35 percent. In January, unless Congress acts, the tax will return to its old pre-2001 self with a $1 million exemption and a 55 percent top rate. That possibility means that the wealthy once again have to decide what to do with their assets.

Of course, Congress can prevent most of this mess. President Obama wants to revert to the 2009 parameters—a $3.5 million exemption and a 45 percent tax rate. Others want make this year’s tax permanent. Some deficit hawks want to let the rate and exemption return to pre-2001 levels to collect needed revenue. And, of course, many people would like the taxes to go away altogether.

The Tax Policy Center, in newly updated tables, shows how different policies would affect the number of estates subject to tax and the amount of revenue the government would collect. If Congress extends this year’s rules, an estimated 3,800 estates—representing less than 0.2 percent of all deaths—would owe taxes totaling just $12 billion in 2013. If the temporary tax cut expires, more than 47,000 estates would pay nearly $38 billion. 

While the estate tax has gotten most attention, the gift tax also faces big changes. Since 2010, anyone could give away as much as $5 million worth of assets to other people without owing any gift taxes to Uncle Sam. Married couples could distribute twice that much. If you give away even more, you owe 35 percent in federal gift tax on the excess.

But if Congress doesn’t act over the next few weeks, the exemption will plummet to just $1 million on January 1 and the tax rate will jump to 55 percent. That’s a real incentive to be very generous before the end of the year. Give $5 million to your favorite niece this month and it costs you $5 million. Give her $5 million next month and, barring congressional action, you’ll also have to give Uncle Sam more than $2 million in gift tax.

One advantage of this year’s large gift tax exclusion and low tax rate is that they match the estate tax parameters—you don’t have to die to take advantage of the bargain basement prices for passing on your wealth.

However, giving while you’re still alive has one big disadvantage if you are gifting assets that have appreciated in value. Your gift to your niece comes with your basis—what you paid for the asset. When she sells the asset, she will owe tax on both your capital gain and any appreciation after the gift. If she inherits the asset, your niece will owe capital gains tax only on the gains that occur after your death.

Discussions of the looming fiscal cliff have paid scant attention to estate and gift taxes. But wealthy people might do well to consider being very generous this month and giving very large gifts at today’s bargain tax prices.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Estate tax up in the air. Is the time to give now?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today