Four retirement planning rules Millennials can break

Retirement planning is full of rules. Some are helpful. Some are unreasonable. But not all of them are a good fit for everyone.

Don Ryan/AP/File
Shavonne Henry, left, poses with her husband, Michael Henry, while playing the computer game "Civilization," at their apartment in Vancouver, Wash.

There are two kinds of people: Those who think rules are made for breaking, and those who can’t use the words “rules” and “breaking” in the same sentence without a pang of anxiety.

I fall into the second group, which means I present this list with a side of guilt. But I do it because I’ve noticed, as you probably have, that retirement planning is full of rules. Some are helpful. Some are unreasonable. Nearly all attempt to put a one-size-fits-all shirt on bank accounts and lifestyles of many different sizes.

Breaking some retirement rules might give you a guilty conscience, but it shouldn’t screw up your future. Here are four of them  you can break, or at the very least, bend to your needs.

1. Save 15% every year for retirement.

Many sources confirm this is a reasonable target, including Fidelity in its latest guidelines.

But it’s probably not reasonable to believe you’ll be able save a steady amount every year, or that you’ll be able to save 15% of your income right out of the gate. Do you want to know how much I saved for retirement my first year out of college? It’s an easy answer, the same one I’d give if you asked about the following year: $0.

What I’m suggesting is not to throw this rule away, but to understand you may need to work up to it. Give yourself a pass if you can’t hit the 15% target every single year — like, say, when you’re young (or when you’re not young, but your kids are, and their preschool tuition makes college tuition look cheap).

Tip: Use a retirement calculator to figure out how much you should be saving, then save more than that when times are flush. Being over-ambitious when you have extra cash will help make up for the years when you can’t save enough.

2. Pick a target-date fund named after the year you plan to retire.

Using a target-date fund to save for retirement isn’t a rule, but it might as well be: By some estimates, 90% of 401(k) contributions will flow into these funds by 2019.

What is generally a rule is to select a fund with the year closest to when you’re planning to retire. That’s because these funds work by automatically rebalancing to take less risk as you approach that year. But what’s technically appropriate for your age may not be appropriate for your individual risk tolerance or investment goals, and funds named for the same year can actually vary widely in the investments they hold.

I’m 33, so a 2050 fund would put me right at a retirement age of 67. The 2050 funds from VanguardFidelity and T. Rowe Pricecurrently are all invested in a mix of roughly 90% stocks and 10% bonds, so it might seem like they’re the same. But as I approach retirement, the funds’ glide paths — how that investment mix changes over time — start to differ. In 2030, when I have 20 years until retirement, the Fidelity fund will still contain 90% stocks. The Vanguard fund will hold about 83% in stocks, and T. Rowe Price just 71%. None of those allocations are inherently bad, but there’s likely one that better reflects how I’d like to be invested at that time.

The problem: Many 401(k)s only offer target-date funds from one fund provider, which means I may be stuck with just one choice for a 2050 fund.

Tip: Select a fund not based on the year in its name, but on how it invests. You can find a fund’s glide path on the fund company’s website. If it takes too much risk for your comfort, look at a fund with an earlier year. If it takes too little, stretch to a later year. The other, and potentially better, option is to build and manage your own portfolio — target-date funds can be expensive, anyway.

3. Subtract your age from 100 to determine your asset allocation.

The resulting number, legend says, is the percentage of your retirement portfolio that should be invested in stocks. The rest goes into bonds. As you can see above, the target-date funds I mentioned are already breaking this rule. Here’s why: As life expectancies tick up, investing in stocks for longer can provide the growth your money needs to tick up with them.

This rule also takes literally nothing outside of your age into account, and it assumes a standard retirement age. But maybe you want to work well into your 70s, or you’ve bought into the promise that using Facebook to sell workout DVDs, essential oils or oysters with pearls inside — I swear this is a thing — means retirement at 40.

Tip: Try an asset allocation tool instead, like this one from Vanguardor this one from Personal Capital.

4. Build an emergency fund before saving for retirement.

An emergency fund is important, but having the full recommended three-to-six months of expenses stashed away is less so, especially if putting that cash together means you’ll miss out on 401(k) matching dollars. That match is a guaranteed return. (You can use a 401(k) calculator to see just how valuable that is.)

Tip: Just $500 in the bank is enough to cover many sudden expenses. You can go back and add more once you’ve contributed enough to your 401(k) to grab the full match.

Arielle O’Shea is a staff writer at NerdWallet, a personal finance website. Email: Twitter: @arioshea.

This article was written by NerdWallet and was originally published by Forbes.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Four retirement planning rules Millennials can break
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today