Where do financially responsible Americans live?

NerdWallet examined data for the 100 most populous US metro areas to determine where residents are best at managing credit, debt and housing costs.

Eric Risberg/AP/File
The Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco. (March 7, 2016).

At a glance, San Francisco and Pittsburgh seem like completely different kinds of cities. One is home to cable cars, the other has the Duquesne Incline. One is known for fresh seafood, the other for loaded sandwiches. The cities have starkly different costs of living, too. But when it comes to their residents’ money-management skills, both of these cities and their surrounding metro areas have financially fit populations.

These cities aren’t the only places that shine when it comes to money. NerdWallet examined data for the 100 most populous U.S. metro areas to determine where residents are best at managing credit, debt and housing costs. The analysis includes credit scores, debt and account delinquency data from the credit reporting agency Equifax, and data on household income, individual income and homeownership costs from the U.S. Census Bureau.

Top 10 financially responsible metro areas

  1. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, California
  2. Madison, Wisconsin
  3. San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, California
  4. Ogden-Clearfield, Utah
  5. Grand Rapids-Wyoming, Michigan
  6. Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minnesota-Wisconsin
  7. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  8. Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Massachusetts
  9. Des Moines-West Des Moines, Iowa
  10. Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Washington

Data used in the analysis

Here’s a closer look at three key measures of residents’ financial fitness and the metro areas that best exemplify these factors.

The metro areas where residents are best at managing credit. VantageScore is a credit score developed by the three major credit reporting bureaus. This score has similarities with the better-known FICO scores — and like FICO, VantageScore 3.0, the current version of the score, has a 300-850 scale. Creditors use these scores to determine creditworthiness.

Of the 100 largest U.S. metro areas, residents in Madison, Wisconsin, have the highest median VantageScore 3.0 at 761. People living in California’s San Jose (755) and San Francisco (752) have the next-highest median credit scores.

NerdWallet also examined the percentage of all credit card and loan balances that are 60 days or more past due in each metro area’s population. Among places in our analysis, the median of overdue balances is 2.16%. The metro areas with the lowest overdue balances are San Jose (0.71%), San Francisco (0.93%) and Madison (0.95%).

The metro areas where residents have the least debt. The analysis weighed each metro area’s debt as a percentage of residents’ income. Of the 100 metro areas, the median of this data is a 2.28% debt-to-income ratio for credit card debt and a 41% debt-to-income ratio for other debt. Grand Rapids, Michigan, and Ogden, Utah, have among the lowest median ratios of credit card debt to median income, with 1.51% and 1.52%, respectively.

The examination of other kinds of consumer debt included mortgages, auto loans and personal loans. San Jose and San Francisco, which have among the highest median annual incomes, have the two lowest debt-to-income ratios, at 12% and 16%. Boston (26%) and Seattle (28%) have among the lowest ratios, too.

The metro areas paying the least in housing expenses. The analysis looked at Census data on median monthly housing costs as a percentage of median household income in each metro area. Among the 100 metro areas, the median housing-to-income figure is 31%. Ogden, Utah (25%), Grand Rapids, Michigan (26%), and Des Moines, Iowa (26%), have the lowest housing expenses in the analysis.

To see the methodology and data on all 100 metro areas, see Metro Areas Where People Are in the Best Financial Shape.

Laura McMullen is a staff writer at NerdWallet, a personal finance website. Email: lmcmullen@nerdwallet.com. Twitter: @lauraemcmullen. Courtney Miller is a data analyst at NerdWallet. Email:courtney.miller@nerdwallet.com.

This story originally appeared on NerdWallet.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.