FIFA World Cup: Breakdown of viewership statistics

In many countries, more than half of the populations tuned into the last FIFA World Cup. During the 2010 FIFA World Cup, 3.2 billion people watched part of the games from home.

Athit Perawongmetha/Reuters
Fans wearing masks of famous soccer players pose for a photo as they celebrate ahead of the 2014 World Cup, at a shopping district in Bangkok June 12, 2014. During the last FIFA World Cup, 3.2 billion people watched at least part of the games.

Forget football, think fútbol.

The World Cup begins today, and all through the run-up we’ve been given the predictable coverage that soccer has finally arrived as a major sport in this country. No doubt it has made great strides in the past few decades, but before succumbing to all the hype it is worth noting that soccer’s foothold in the United States remains relatively weak.

In many countries, more than half of the population tuned into the last World Cup, in 2010. Viewership in the US, while garnering record ratings, had among the lowest penetration rates.

Still, the sheer volume of humanity who viewed the 2010 games, according to FIFA, is mind-blowing:

  • The average in-home viewership around the globe for each of the 64 matches in 2010 World Cup was 188.4 million. Compare that to the US-record-setting 111.5 million viewers who tuned in to the 2014 Super Bowl.
  • If you tried to watch end-to-end all 71,867 hours of television broadcasted by global networks from the 2010 World Cup, you’d be watching TV for 8.2 years straight—without sleep.
  • The games were broadcast to 214 countries and territories, 21 more than the membership of the United Nations.
  • 3.2 billion people watched part of the games from home in 2010, roughly half the world’s population at the time.
  • About 909.6 million home viewers watched some of the 2010 World Cup final between the Netherlands and Spain—more than 14 times the total population of both nations, and about three times of the population of the United States.
  • Out-of-home watchers of the 2010 final “likely pushed the total audience reach to more than 1 billion,” making it the most-watched event in the history of broadcast.

FIFA expects those viewership records to fall during the games this summer, the head of broadcast told Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to FIFA World Cup: Breakdown of viewership statistics
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today