JPMorgan will likely settle London Whale investigations for about $700 million

JP Morgan will pay about $700 million to settle a civil law investigation into the company's London Whale derivative loss, according to a source familiar with the matter

Richard Drew/ AP Photo/ File
JPMorgan Chase Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon is interviewed on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange Friday, July 12, 2013.

JPMorgan Chase & Co is close to settling civil law investigations into its London Whale derivatives loss and expects to pay about $700 million, according to a source familiar with the matter.

Completion of the deal depends on coordinating agreements with multiple government agencies, said the source who was not authorized to speak publicly about the matter.

The source spoke after Bloomberg News and the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that JPMorgan has agreed with regulators on how much it will pay.

But as the company worked to resolve the civil matters, the U.S. Department of Justice pressed ahead on a related criminal case involving the loss. Prosecutors on Monday filed a grand jury indictment accusing two former JPMorgan traders of fraud, conspiracy and making false filings to the SEC.

The indictment, against Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout, advances the prosecution of criminal charges brought against the men last month by the U.S. Department of Justice. The men are accused of hiding the mounting losses on the derivatives early last year.

A third trader, Bruno Iksil, has been cooperating with the criminal investigation and has not been charged criminally. Iksil was nicknamed the "London Whale" by hedge funds for the size of the large size of the trades he made for the company's Chief Investment Office in London.

JPMorgan corrected its first quarter financial report last year after concluding the loss to that point had been understated by the traders. The company has said that executives did not intend to mislead investors, though CEO Jamie Dimon apologized for initially calling press reports of dangerous trading a "tempest in a teapot."

The bank, the biggest in the United States, ultimately lost $6.2 billion on the trades and is now under intense scrutiny from regulators over its risk and financial controls.

The settlements the company expects soon would be over civil law issues with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve and the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority, the source said.

JPMorgan has been pushing for weeks to resolve the company's liability to regulators. News of an imminent settlement came on a day the company's board of directors planned to meet.

The bank is trying to mend its relationships with regulators after surprising them with the derivatives loss at a time when Chief Executive Jamie Dimon was complaining that the regulators were going too far with reforms to avert another financial crisis.

The company recently said it would record more than $1.5 billion of additional legal expenses in the third quarter.

JPMorgan shares rose 1 percent on Monday to close at $53.14. Last year, just before JPMorgan acknowledged that it was losing billions of dollars are on the derivatives, the stock traded around $41.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.