Solyndra who? The Energy Department's loan program is now profitable.

The DoE loan program became a lightning rod during the 2012 presidential election for backing solar company Solyndra, which later went bankrupt. A few years later, it's in the black. 

Richard Sitler /The Southern/AP/File
Rob Mathis working for CH Electrical installs a panel on a bank of solar panels at Blue Sky Vineyard, in Makanda, Ill.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) loan program that became a lightning rod during the 2012 presidential election is now turning a profit.

The program became infamous for backing solar company Solyndra, which later went bankrupt.

Three years after Solyndra's failure, though, the program is now in the black.

Interest payments from projects funded by the loan program were $810 million in September, higher than the $780 million in losses recorded, reports Reuters, citing DOE statistics.

Those losses make up 2.28 percent of the loan program's total commitments, with the $528 million Solyndra loan making up the bulk of that amount.

The program allows the DOE to guarantee a loan for between 50 and 70 percent of an approved project's cost.

Borrowers must secure a separate loan from the U.S. Treasury or a private lender for the balance.

The program was created in 2005 under the Bush Administration, but its renewable-energy component was added in 2009 as part of the Obama Administration's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act stimulus program.

The emphasis on renewable energy made the program a target of criticism from Republicans, especially after Solyndra's 2011 bankruptcy and the bankruptcy of Fisker Automotive—which received government loans under the separate Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) program.

The DOE issued no new loans between late 2011 and this year.

But the program has helped provide funding for renewable-energy projects when private investors were unwilling, Peter Davidson—executive director of the DOE Loans Program Office—said in an interview with Reuters.

After the DOE approved loans for five utility-scale photovoltaic solar projects, 17 more have been funded by private investors who would not have taken the risk at first, Davidson said.

The DOE also doesn't expect significant future losses from the revitalized program, Davidson said.

That's because most of the projects funded by the program are large power plants that are now producing electricity for the grid, including photovoltaic and solar thermal plants, wind farms, and geothermal energy plants.

This year, the DOE began issuing funds again, although exclusively to renewable-energy projects.

In February it approved $6.5 billion in loan guarantees for two nuclear reactors in Georgia, and a conditional $150 million for a wind farm off the coast of Cape Cod, Massachusetts.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Solyndra who? The Energy Department's loan program is now profitable.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today