Estimated 35,200 US traffic deaths reported in 2013

The National Safety Council estimated that during 2013, 35,200 people died in US traffic accidents, plus there were about 3.8 million crash injuries requiring medical attention. An agency official blamed most of the accidents on human error.

  • close
    Automobile traffic backs-up as it travels north from San Diego to Los Angeles along Interstate Highway 5 in California on Dec. 10, 2013. The National Safety Council reported that about 35,200 traffic deaths occurred in 2013, about a three percent decrease from the previous year.
    Mike Blake/Reuters
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration won't release official numbers on 2013 U.S. traffic fatalities until the end of the year, but early estimates from the National Safety Council show a three percent drop from 2012's stats. Unfortunately, that news isn't as great as it might seem.

The NSC is a century-old nonprofit that was chartered by the U.S. Congress and given a mission " to save lives by preventing injuries and deaths at work, in homes and communities, and on the road through leadership, research, education and advocacy". NSC gathers data on traffic accidents from authorities in all 50 states, as well as the District of Columbia.

As far as fatality stats go, NHTSA and NSC differ dramatically in their approaches. NHTSA only counts accidents that happen on public roads, but NSC also includes accidents that occur on private property. Though there are reasons behind both methodologies, many sticklers prefer NSC's.

Recommended: Top 10 most expensive car repair mistakes

NSC data may also be more accurate because it considers deaths that occur within one year of a traffic accident to be related to that accident, whereas NHTSA's window is only 30 days. In other words, if you were in an accident and hit someone, and that someone died after spending four months in the hospital, NSC would consider the death to be a traffic fatality, while NHTSA would not.

2012 vs. 2013

By all accounts, 2012 was a terrible year for auto accidents. NSC attributes the increase in injuries and deaths to 2012's mild winter, which encouraged motorists to do more traveling during the chilly months -- and of course, more traveling means more opportunities for accidents.

For 2013, NSC's preliminary report identifies around 3.8 million injuries related to traffic collisions. (For statistical purposes, NSC only counts injuries that require medical attention.) That's about two percent below 2012 figures.

NSC also estimates some 35,200 auto-related deaths occurred in 2013. The good news is that that's three percent fewer than in 2012. The bad news? It's one percent higher than 2011. 

The auto-related fatalities, injuries, and property damage that occurred in 2013 came with a high price tag. When you add up all the medical expenses, employer costs, lost wages, property damage, and related expenses, the total clocks in at $267.5 billion. As high as that is, though, it's still three percent lower than 2012.

Bottom line: Auto fatalities and injuries may be leveling off in the U.S. Stats may not improve dramatically until advanced safety systems like automated braking and adaptive cruise control roll out to the broader public. Further down the line, as vehicle-to-vehicle systems become commonplace, though, we could see as many as 81 percent fewer accidents on the roads. That's something to look forward to.


Follow The Car Connection on FacebookTwitter and Google+.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best auto bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link in the blog description box above.


We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.