Pricing carbon emissions? Bring it on, some large companies say

Large companies may be willing to pay for their emissions. Major companies including Walmart, American Electric Power and the five major oil companies have all incorporated carbon emission costs into their financial plans, according to a report by environmental data company CDP. 

  • close
    Smoke rises from the stacks of the La Cygne Generating Station coal-fired power plant in La Cygne, Kan. Companies are preparing to pay for carbon emissions, a new CDP study shows.
    Charlie Riedel/AP Photo/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption

It seems many large companies are willing to pay a price for their emissions.

A new report by environmental data company CDP found that at least 29 companies--including the five major oil companies, Walmart, and American Electric Power--are now incorporating a price on carbon emissions into the their financial plans, according toThe New York Times.

Many of these companies previously resisted acknowledging the scientific consensus around climate change, and many have close ties to the U.S. Republican Party, which makes this a remarkable shift.

Recommended: US energy in five maps (infographics)

Now, the companies are moving toward accounting for carbon emissions as a cost of doing business.

ExxonMobil has long been known for contributions to research attempting to deny climate change, but now the company seems to be planning for a future in which carbon emissions are priced at $60 a ton. 

The oil giant believes the U.S. government and others will enact some kind of carbon-pricing scheme sometime in the near future, ExxonMobil spokesman Alan Jeffers told the Times.

Such a policy in the U.S. probably won't come out of the current deadlocked Congress, but steps are being taken in that direction.

The EPA recently proposed rules that limited carbon-dioxide emissions from new coal-fired power plants.

This--along with rising supplies and the falling cost of natural gas--is already curtailing the use of coal as a fuel for energy generation. The Tennessee Valley Authority now plans to shut down eight coal-fired electricity-generating units, and ultimately cut its coal use by half.

The emissions battle over coal could make it an economically-unsound asset.

For electric-car drivers, the situation can only improve.

Some skeptics say coal-generated energy makes electric cars bad for the environment.

But even on the nation's dirtiest grid, the well-to-wheels emissions of an electric car are barely worse than the most fuel-efficient non-hybrid, according to a recent Union of Concerned Scientists report.

On the nation's cleanest grids, no internal-combustion vehicle can match an electric car's low overall emissions.

As grids get cleaner, so do electric cars--which can't be said of gasoline, diesel, or natural-gas vehicles.

If big business is now willing to account for the external costs of its emissions, more than two centuries after the start of the Industrial Revolution, perhaps change is possible after all.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best auto bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link in the blog description box above.


We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.