Pricing carbon emissions? Bring it on, some large companies say

Large companies may be willing to pay for their emissions. Major companies including Walmart, American Electric Power and the five major oil companies have all incorporated carbon emission costs into their financial plans, according to a report by environmental data company CDP. 

Charlie Riedel/AP Photo/File
Smoke rises from the stacks of the La Cygne Generating Station coal-fired power plant in La Cygne, Kan. Companies are preparing to pay for carbon emissions, a new CDP study shows.

It seems many large companies are willing to pay a price for their emissions.

A new report by environmental data company CDP found that at least 29 companies--including the five major oil companies, Walmart, and American Electric Power--are now incorporating a price on carbon emissions into the their financial plans, according toThe New York Times.

Many of these companies previously resisted acknowledging the scientific consensus around climate change, and many have close ties to the U.S. Republican Party, which makes this a remarkable shift.

Now, the companies are moving toward accounting for carbon emissions as a cost of doing business.

ExxonMobil has long been known for contributions to research attempting to deny climate change, but now the company seems to be planning for a future in which carbon emissions are priced at $60 a ton. 

The oil giant believes the U.S. government and others will enact some kind of carbon-pricing scheme sometime in the near future, ExxonMobil spokesman Alan Jeffers told the Times.

Such a policy in the U.S. probably won't come out of the current deadlocked Congress, but steps are being taken in that direction.

The EPA recently proposed rules that limited carbon-dioxide emissions from new coal-fired power plants.

This--along with rising supplies and the falling cost of natural gas--is already curtailing the use of coal as a fuel for energy generation. The Tennessee Valley Authority now plans to shut down eight coal-fired electricity-generating units, and ultimately cut its coal use by half.

The emissions battle over coal could make it an economically-unsound asset.

For electric-car drivers, the situation can only improve.

Some skeptics say coal-generated energy makes electric cars bad for the environment.

But even on the nation's dirtiest grid, the well-to-wheels emissions of an electric car are barely worse than the most fuel-efficient non-hybrid, according to a recent Union of Concerned Scientists report.

On the nation's cleanest grids, no internal-combustion vehicle can match an electric car's low overall emissions.

As grids get cleaner, so do electric cars--which can't be said of gasoline, diesel, or natural-gas vehicles.

If big business is now willing to account for the external costs of its emissions, more than two centuries after the start of the Industrial Revolution, perhaps change is possible after all.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Pricing carbon emissions? Bring it on, some large companies say
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today