FlightCar: Get free airport parking. Earn money from your car.

FlightCar is taking on the airport parking and rental car industries with a new model, where air travelers rent out their cars. The startup, founded in February by three teenagers, joins the growing car-sharing industry.

Paul Sakuma/AP/File
Customers wait in line at a Hertz rental car counter at San Jose International Airport in San Jose, Calif. FlightCar, a startup company that allows travelers to rent out their cars while they are out of town, promises to eliminate lines and maximize convenience for drivers.

A new car rental company is irking the likes of Hertz, Avis, and even the City of San Francisco with a cost-cutting service that threatens to encroach on lucrative airport business.

FlightCar, a car-sharing service that launched in San Francisco in February, lets travelers rent out their cars while they are out of town. As long as a car is less than 14 years old and worth less than $60,000, it can be listed on FlightCar’s website as being ready to rent.

In return for dropping off their car with FlightCar, car-owners get black-car valet-service to terminals, a car wash, the peace of mind of not leaving their car in a fee-eating lot, and up to $10 a day if their car is rented. Car-renters skipping traditional rental companies for FlightCar save up to 50 percent on their vehicle and get free insurance, GPS, and curbside pickup and drop-off services no matter where they live within a 10-minute radius of the lot.

If a driver finds a car that can be rented more cheaply, FlightCar guarantees the driver a free rental.

It sounds simple, but it took a trio of teenagers to come up with it. The founders of FlightCar – who turned down Harvard, Princeton, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to do so – say their ambitions are big: to “revolutionize the airport parking and car rental industries one car at a time.”

The concept has caught on, attracting more than 1,400 of car-sharers and clinching more than 1,500 reservations in a matter of months, says Rujul Zaparde, CEO and cofounder of FlightCar. Within the span of a few weeks in April, FlightCar raised $5.5 million and got American Idol host Ryan Seacrest and Airbnb cofounder Brian Chesky to sign on as investors.

The company joins the fast-growing car-sharing industry, which by one estimate (.pdf) could become a $9 billion to $10 billion market by 2016.

But even as FlightCar rides the momentum and promotes its new site by Boston’s Logan International Airport, the company faces legal trouble.

On June 7, San Francisco’s city attorney filed a lawsuit against FlightCar accusing it of dodging fees and unfairly undermining its competitors in the rental-car business at San Francisco International Airport (SFO).

SFO requires all off-airport car rental agencies to operate under a permit and pay it 10 percent of their gross profits and $20 for each car that is rented out. FlightCar, which says it “operates under an entirely different business model” than competing off-airport rental car businesses, does neither, arguing it is exempt from the rules because of its unique infrastructure. 

"We're not a traditional car rental agency, but a [peer-to-peer] car sharing company. Most of our owners come from word of mouth. We also have a few billboards on the peninsula that attract owners dropping off cars to our service," Mr. Zaparde says.

For now, FlightCar says it does not expect to see any business impact from SFO’s legal actions. The complaints it has received from SFO were perhaps only to be expected, Mr. Zaparde says.

"There are three companies — Enterprise Global, Avis Budget Group, and Hertz — that control the vast majority of this market, and they've been doing it the same way for decades. We have a new, more efficient model that's disrupting this industry ... so we only expect to face opposition," Mr. Zaparde says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.