Energy Department to increase biofuel funding by $10 million

The US Department of Energy announced plans to expand its investment in the development of biofuels by $10 million, Ingram writes.

Janet S. Carter/The Free Press/AP
Corn kernels peer out from the husk on an ear of corn in a corn field off Queen Street in Kinston, N.C., in this August 2012 file photo. Biofuel has a near-constant fight on its hands from several quarters, often over the fuel versus food debate, Ingram writes.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) has announced it will put up another $10 million in funding towards the expansion of biofuels.

It's the second positive announcement in recent weeks for biofuel advocates, as the Senate's "fiscal cliff" avoidance measures have also seen many biofuel initiatives extended until the end of the year.

The DoE confirms (via Autoblog Green) that five projects in four different states will benefit from the extra investment.

Up to $2.5 million of the extra funding will go to Novozymes, based out of Davis, California. Along with a team of partners, Novozymes seeks to find new sources of enzymes used to break down biomass into usable compounds.

The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Texas AgriLife Research will each be awarded up to $2.4 million. 

Washington-based PNNL looks to increase the number of fuel molecules in a particular type of fungi, and will work with the University of Kansas, and others, to complete the project. AgriLife converts elements of lignocellulosic biomass (from paper, wood residue and more) into biofuel precursors.

California-based Lygos is set to receive up to $1.8 million, and aims to develop efficient, inexpensive methods of converting biomass into useful chemicals.

The remaining $1.2 million is set aside for J. Craig Venture Institute, based in Rockville, Maryland. The project will be looking into new enzyme technologies for the production of biofuel from biomass.

Many of the projects involve collaborative work from Universities and colleges across the country.

Biofuel has a near-constant fight on its hands from several quarters, often over the fuel versus food debate--but products produced from waste biomass are more promising--and greater research funding can only help.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.