Are hybrid stereotypes a thing of the past?

With more hybrids than ever before on the market, have hybrid cars and their drivers broken through their own stereotypes? Gordon-Bloomfield offers some reasons for why the hybrid seems to be entering into the mainstream.

David Zalubowski/AP/File
This February 2012 file photo shows a line of 2012 Prius sedans at a Toyota dealership in the south Denver suburb of Littleton, Colo. Gordon-Bloomfield offers her perspective on why hybrids have seem to shaken their stereotypes.

There was a time when anyone who drove a hybrid car--especially a Toyota Prius--was viewed with distain by the majority of other road users. 

They were seen as aloof, over-privileged, and perhaps, thanks to a certain episode of South Park, smug about their car buying decision. 

But with more hybrids than ever before on the market, have hybrid cars broken through their own stereotypes?

And do people who drive them no-longer conform to the old image of hybrid drivers?

Yes, and here’s why.

The Prius has grown up

Although Toyota’s first generation Prius sedan and second generation Prius hatchback offered impressive gas mileage, many car buyers disliked their high-tech dashboards, underpowered engines, and extremely light power-steering. 

The 3rd generation Toyota Prius--launched in 2010--improved on the flaws of earlier models, and became the first Prius hybrid mainstream buyers were happy to drive. 

It offered more power, a more conventional interior, and the best gas milage of any Prius to date. 

By the time the Prius family expanded earlier this year with the 2012 Prius V, 2012 Prius C and 2012 Prius Plug-in Hybrid, more people than ever before were happy to drive a hybrid.

Motorsport has made hybrid technology cool

When the Honda Insight and Toyota Prius first debuted, most motorsport teams weren’t interested in hybrid engine technology.

But thanks to systems like KERS, hybrid car technology has seeped into everything from Formula One to Drag Racing. 

Earlier this year, a hybrid car even won the famous Le Mans 24-Hour endurance race

As with other automotive technologies, motorsport’s involvement in hybrid technology not only helps improve it, but it helps to raise its profile.

Variety makes picking a hybrid easier

At one point, if you wanted a hybrid car you had to choose between the compact Toyota Prius, and the equally uninspiring Honda Insight. 

Now, with everything from compact cars like the Prius C through to luxury cars and even SUVs like the Porsche Cayenne Hybrid, car buyers have a lot more choice than they once did. 

It also means they can choose a hybrid car which suits their needs, rather than just their gas mileage requirements. 

With more hybrid car variety, hybrid cars have become a much more valid vehicle choice for those looking for a new car than they once were. 

Hybrid cars don’t look strange any more

Finally, and most importantly, not all hybrid cars look like hybrid cars any more. 

And by that, we mean weird, futuristic vehicles designed to cut through the air with the lowest drag possible. 

Take the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid for example, or the 2013 Lexus CT200h. 

Neither look like the stereotypical Prius of days gone by, and both have conventional interiors too, making them far more appealing to someone making the jump from a traditional gasoline car to a hybrid. 

And in the case of the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid, its performance, load carrying capabilities, and even gas mileage are enough to give more traditionally-styled hybrids a tough time on the dealer lot. 

Do you think hybrids are finally cool? Do you think other road users view hybrid owners with distain, or envy? 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Are hybrid stereotypes a thing of the past?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today