Biden-Trump rematch: How dueling economic records stack up

|
GE Appliances, Haier/AP/File
Operators Norma Morin (left) and Kossiwa Eggenam complete door assembly for dishwashers on the new assembly line inside the dishwasher plant at GE Appliances’ headquarters in Louisville, Kentucky, Sept. 27, 2023. U.S.-based factories with both domestic and foreign ownership have been adding jobs during the current expansion.

No president controls the economy, but he or she has to react to it. In this election, American voters will choose between presidents who both pushed through stimulus packages to help the nation recover from the pandemic tailspin in 2020. And both have something to brag about. Who did better? 

It depends on where voters look and how they care to evaluate the candidates.

On jobs, President Joe Biden is the clear winner. The economy created jobs at a faster rate than during any other president in at least three decades. But on wage growth and inflation, former President Donald Trump holds the edge over his likely rival in November.

Why We Wrote This

In the eyes of their supporters, both Donald Trump and Joe Biden have a lot to boast about when it comes to economic performance. Our charts give context for their competing claims.

Of course, timing and context matter in such economic comparisons. Both presidents could be called fortunate in that they inherited economies that were recovering from deep recessions: the Great Recession in Mr. Trump’s case and the pandemic-driven downturn in 2020 for Mr. Biden. They also both pushed huge stimulus packages to counter that latter recession, packages that goosed the economy even as they ballooned the federal debt.

SOURCE:

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Freddie Mac, University of Michigan, S&P Dow Jones Indices

|
Jacob Turcotte/Staff

While they each can point to significant economic policies during their tenure, it’s fair to say other powers – the Federal Reserve, OPEC, companies and consumers, for example – also had plenty of say over the direction and speed of growth.

The long-term consequences of these presidential policies still have to play out.

Many economists applaud Mr. Trump’s tax cuts, even as critics decry them as giveaways to rich people at a time of growing burdens of interest on the national debt.

Many environmentalists see Mr. Biden’s green energy moves as a major step toward controlling the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions.

Still, the dramatic escalation of federal debt under both presidents will hurt the economy in the long term, most economists agree. And their restrictions on trade with rivals like China and Russia, while perhaps necessary for geopolitical reasons, are likely to slow future growth.   

Polls including a recent NBC News survey show voters currently trusting Mr. Trump more than Mr. Biden on economic issues. At the same time, a decline in the inflation rate has helped consumer confidence rebound strongly in recent months. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Biden-Trump rematch: How dueling economic records stack up
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2024/0306/Biden-Trump-rematch-How-dueling-economic-records-stack-up
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe