Bebeto Matthews/AP
Rachel Berry sits in her living room decorated with her art, July 6, 2020, in New York. Artists like Ms. Berry rely on waiter jobs to pay the bills. Restaurants employed over 273,000 people before the pandemic. As the city reopened in May, that number fell to 100,000.

Waiter by day, actor by night: In NYC, it's a fading option

As New York City attempts to reopen, some fear that jobs for the city's creative class are no longer available. “Suddenly I don’t have young artists to work with because they can’t afford New York,” the owner of a production company said. 

It's been the story for many: a starry-eyed creative type looking for a big break in the Big Apple – wait tables to pay the bills while auditioning, performing, singing, painting, dancing, writing, whatever it takes to make the dreams of success come true.

But there's been a plot twist, thanks to the coronavirus putting food servers out of work in recent months as restaurants were forced to shut down their dine-in services. And much uncertainty remains over what restaurant dining will look like even as New York City reopens.

Questions of whether there will be enough business for establishments to stay open and even have waiter jobs to fill are causing concern about what that's going to mean for the city's creative class if the jobs that helped them be able to live here and add to the city's artistic culture are no longer readily available.

"It really is a part of the artist's life in New York, so I don't know what that's going to look like if it's just suddenly not an option anymore," said Travis McClung, who has spent close to nine years waiting tables while doing theater, singing, and more recently, trying to build his career in video editing and post-production.

The virus has been devastating for the city's restaurant workers. According to the state Department of Labor, restaurants and other eateries employed just over 273,000 people in February, before the city shut down in mid-March due to the pandemic. In April, during the peak of virus cases, that number had fallen to under 78,000. As the city reopened in May, it rose slightly to close to 100,000, still vastly below where it had been.

And while outdoor dining has been allowed in recent weeks, with around 6,600 restaurants in the five boroughs applying for permits to feed people on sidewalks and streets, the return of indoor dining has been put off indefinitely over fears that confined quarters would make virus cases spike.

For Mr. McClung, who came to New York City in 2009 from a Dallas, Texas, suburb to study theater in college and started waiting tables here, a restaurant job has been a safety net, of sorts. Pre-pandemic, New York City's vibrant restaurant scene was busy enough that he always felt he had a fallback.

"It was a sense of security, it let me stay in New York City, pay the rent here," he said.

That's what led to his last pre-virus waiter job, a position at a casual dining place on Manhattan's Upper West Side.

"I had a big gig editing and it canceled and I panicked and then my friend posted he was leaving that job," Mr. McClung said. "I messaged him for a referral and then I got hired the next day."

Rachel Berry, who moved to New York City in 2004, tried her hand at a bunch of different jobs like dog walking and nannying before moving to bartending and some waiting tables in 2016.

The Laurel, Maryland, native even spent some time at a 9-to-5 gig in her early 20s, but found the structure too rigid to give her enough time to work on her creative pursuits, which have included photography, painting, performing, and most recently, interior design work.

"There's just something about the food service industry," she said. "It affords me a life that I can get by in New York."

She worries now about what will still be available in restaurants, as social distancing restrictions will require lower capacities in food and drink establishments for the foreseeable future, and whether she would have to work even more in other fields like retail to make what she has been able to in food service.

"Am I going to have the same opportunities afforded to me financially, or, you know, am I going to be stuck in this, I need two to three jobs to get by," Ms. Berry asked.

And that's of course assuming people don't leave, or hesitate to come to New York City now in the first place, said Jen Lyon, owner of MeanRed Productions, a company that puts on arts and music events.

That's a concern to her, as someone who looks to work with up-and-comers, in a city where it was already expensive and difficult for artists to sustain themselves.

As someone who spent years bartending, she has an appreciation for food service jobs and what they offer creative types.

They're "the best jobs to have when you needed to focus on your art, especially in New York," she said.

But now, if those jobs largely disappear, "What happens in my world is suddenly I don't have young artists to work with because they can't afford New York," she said. "You don't have people creating art in New York anymore."

The pandemic "has scattered a lot of the potential artists," she said. "We're going to lose a decade of possible talent until people figure out how to stay."

Losing its creatives is also a "huge threat" to the city's fabric overall, said Eli Dvorkin, editorial and policy director at the Center for an Urban Future, which advocates for policies that make New York City more equitable.

"That's a huge problem for New York which has been so dependent on its role as a cultural capital of the world," he said.

"As a city we can't afford to lose our creative edge. It's been one of the key drivers of the city's economic growth over the past decades," Mr. Dvorkin added. "It's one of the reasons why I think New York maintains its status as a beacon for creative, innovative people from all over the world."

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

Editor’s note: As a public service, the Monitor has removed the paywall for all our coronavirus coverage. It’s free.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Waiter by day, actor by night: In NYC, it's a fading option
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today