Adding more women to workforce could extend bull market, study finds

More women entering the workforce could add $2.87 trillion dollars to the US market capitalization for the next 10 years, according to S&P Global, but issues around childcare and maternity leave still need to be addressed in order for women to enter and remain in jobs long term.

Michelle Stocker/AP
Brandi Johnson, steel mental worker at H&H Industries located in Madison, Wisc., caulks a PVC pipe. The US is currently ranked 20th out of 22 countries for participation in women labor force according to the Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development.

The secret to unlocking a further $6 trillion of gains in global stocks and adding another 10 years to this bull run? Forget tax cuts and share buybacks, women are key, according to research by S&P Global.

The United States lags developed country peers in terms of the share of women in work. Even if it just catches up with other economies over the coming decade those extra workers would add a total of $455 billion to its economic output over that period, delivering huge additional gains for stock markets in both the world's biggest economy and around the planet.

An increase in women's labor force participation rate (LFPR) to that of other advanced countries would drive US GDP up by 0.2 percent a year, fueling estimated gains of 0.7 percent a year in the S&P 500, S&P Global said in a report.

This incremental gain could add a total of $2.87 trillion to US market capitalization over the next decade. The current market cap of the S&P 500 is $24.54 trillion, Reuters data showed.

Because global stock markets typically take their cue from Wall Street, equities in trade-sensitive countries such as Germany, China, and Korea could benefit even more from US economic expansion than the S&P 500.

US women's contribution to GDP growth would add $5.87 trillion to global market capitalization over the 10-year timeframe, doubling the length of the current bull run.

That's around 12.9 percent of the current market cap of MSCI's All Country World index, $45.4 trillion.

But these figures depend on American women entering, and staying in, work.

Having been among the pioneers of women's workforce participation in the 1990s, the United States slid to 20th place among 22 advanced OECD economies for women's labor force participation by 2016.

Women's LFPR in the United States reached 74 percent in 1990 and has remained roughly stable since, while it has increased elsewhere.

"A concerted effort to increase participation and foster retention of women in the American workforce, particularly in those professions traditionally filled by men, represents a substantial opportunity for growth of the world's principal economy," the authors of the report argued.

Childcare remains the biggest obstacle stopping women from fully participating in the labor force, they added, and the United States is the only OECD country that does not provide income support during maternity or parental leave by law.

"If the US were to follow the lead of many other developed countries and implement policies that encourage women to enter and remain in the workforce, the effects could reverberate globally, supporting a stock market boom far greater than the economic growth itself," they said. 

This story was reported by Reuters. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Adding more women to workforce could extend bull market, study finds
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today