Uber exec steps down after sexual harassment claim surfaces

Amit Singhal failed to disclose that he left Google after a sexual harassment allegation. He denies the allegation.

Jeff Chiu/AP/File
Amit Singhal, senior vice president and software engineer at Google Inc., speaks at Google I/O 2013 in San Francisco.

Uber’s top engineer, Amit Singhal, has resigned after admitting that he failed to disclose an allegation of sexual harassment that emerged during his previous employment at Google. 

Mr. Singhal was asked to resign on Monday morning by Uber's chief executive officer, Travis Kalanick, according to Recode. He denies the allegation – deemed “credible” by an internal investigation at Google – as well as the notion that he left the company because of it. 

“Harassment is unacceptable in any setting. I certainly want everyone to know that I do not condone and have not committed such behavior,” he wrote the Associated Press in an emailed statement. “In my 20-year career, I’ve never been accused of anything like this before and the decision to leave Google was my own.” 

The announcement comes during a low point for Uber, which is about to undertake perhaps its most serious campaign to shed a reputation for misogyny following a blog post by former engineer Susan Fowler that described ingrained sexism throughout the company.  

As The Christian Science Monitor reported last week, the company has responded to Ms. Fowler’s allegations by hiring former attorney general Eric Holder to head an investigative panel on sexism in its workplace, as well as promising to follow its public-company tech peers in producing reports with data on in-house gender diversity.

But Uber has done plenty to earn its current reputation, as the Monitor's Schuyler Velasco noted back in 2015, with its early failures to protect female passengers and drivers standing alongside charges of sexism in its corporate ranks – and even less subtle displays of insensitivity: 

Last year, Mr. Kalanick drew fire for calling his company “Boob-er” in a GQ profile, referencing what a boon Uber’s success has been for his sex life. In October, the company apologized for a “hot chick” promotion from one of its offices in France that paired passengers with attractive female drivers, complete with the tagline, “Who said women don’t know how to drive?”

Incidents like those, combined with continued safety problems even after an announced revamp of its policies, have helped paint Uber as a company that either doesn’t get it or doesn’t really care.  

Singhal’s departure from Google came after 15 years atop the search division – a key one for the company's finances. At the time, he said he planned to focus on philanthropy.  

“As I entered the fifteenth year of working at Google, I've been asking myself the question, ‘What would you want to do for the next 15?’ The answer has overwhelmingly been: Give back to others,” he wrote in a goodbye letter then, according to Recode.  

But in January, just over a year after leaving Google, he announced that he would join Uber to work on the self-driving car program with Kalanick. 

An Uber spokeswoman told the AP that Kalanick requested Singhal’s resignation after Recode informed the company of the previous allegation. She added that Singhal’s failure to disclose the allegation was the issue, not Uber’s hiring process. 

Recode reports, citing anonymous sources, that the Google employee who filed the complaint against Singhal worked closely with him on the search team, but did not want to go public with the charges.

This report includes material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.