Mexico threatens to end NAFTA talks if US proposes tariffs

In an interview with Bloomberg, Mexico's economy minister warned that his country will break off NAFTA negotiations if the United States proposes tariffs on goods imported from Mexico. 

Daniel Becerril/Reuters/File
Trucks wait in the line for border customs control to cross into the United States at the World Trade Bridge in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico in November 2016.

Threatened by President Trump’s proposed 30 percent border tax, Mexico said it is not afraid of a tough negotiation.

Mexico’s economy minister, Ildefonso Guajardo, on Monday warned against the suggested border tariffs on products from Mexico by the US government, saying his country would break off negotiations on the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, if that were to happen. The remarks, hinting at a rough path ahead, highlight the possible diplomatic and economic ramifications of the proposal Mr. Trump has long urged.

“The moment that they say, ‘We’re going to put a 20 percent tariff on cars,’ I get up from the table,” Mr. Guajardo said in an interview with Bloomberg. “Bye-bye.”

NAFTA, the 1994 trade deal that eliminated most tariffs on products traded among Canada, the United States, and Mexico, was a controversial topic in the 2016 US presidential election, as Trump repeatedly criticized the pact for causing job losses in the United States, calling the pact “a disaster.” Since his inauguration, Trump and his administration have vowed to scuttle NAFTA if they cannot “tweak” the agreement to benefit US interests.

Yet, Guajardo’s remarks on Monday underscore Mexico’s hard-line stance on pulling out of NAFTA – despite the enormous boost the pact has given the Mexican economy – rather than accepting new, less advantageous terms, as The Christian Science Monitor reported on Jan. 26.

As the sole developing country in the pact, NAFTA has likely accelerated and locked in the trade liberalization in Mexico, according to a Congressional Research Service report last Wednesday. With the implementation of the pact, Mexico has seen its farm exports to the United States triple and hundreds of thousands of auto manufacturing jobs created throughout the years, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.

“There could be no other option, Guajardo said in a TV interview in January. “Go for something that is less than what we already have? It would not make sense to stay.”

Yet, the trade is no one-way street. Considering that US exports to Mexico have increased three and a half times since NAFTA came into force, experts have warned that Trump won’t get all he wants in the upcoming negotiations. US Chamber of Commerce said in December an estimated 6 million US jobs rely on trade with Mexico, as 40 percent of all Mexican imports come from America.

“[Trump] will be faced with the choice of walking away and doing something drastic, or essentially folding but declaring victory,” William Reinsch, a distinguished fellow at the Stimson Center and former president of the National Foreign Trade Council, told the Monitor in January.

If Mexico does pull out of the agreement, the trade between Mexico and the United States will be subject to the strictures set by the World Trade Organization, which limits possible tariffs on Mexican goods at an average of around 3 percent, according to Mexican think tank Emerging Markets Political Risk Analysis (EMPRA). That rate “would take away some of our margin of competitiveness,” but would be manageable, the minister said.

But as Mexican officials expect the new round of talks to start in June, Guajardo is still optimistic about the prospect.

“I think there is a way to find a very good agreement that will be a win-win for the three countries,” he told Bloomberg.

This report includes material from the Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Mexico threatens to end NAFTA talks if US proposes tariffs
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2017/0228/Mexico-threatens-to-end-NAFTA-talks-if-US-proposes-tariffs
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe