Tesla posts first profitable quarter in three years

The electric carmaker Tesla surprised investors with its first profitable quarter in three years, and CEO Elon Musk said that the company does not need to raise more capital for its more affordable Model 3 sedan.

Stephen Lam/Reuters
Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk introduces the falcon wing door on the Model X electric sports-utility vehicles during a presentation in Fremont, Calif., in September 2015.

For the first time in three years, Tesla Motors was profitable.

The electric car manufacturer posted a profitable third quarter on Wednesday, easing some tensions among investors about the company’s viability. Despite the recent downgrade of Tesla shares by Goldman Sachs, the company ended the quarter with $176 million in positive cash flow.

"Things are looking good," Musk said in a conference call. "It's not to say there could be some darkness ahead... [but] it's overall looking quite promising."

Following the announcement, CEO Elon Musk said that the company will not need to raise more capital for its more affordable Model 3 sedan. In previous quarters, investors expressed concerns that the company would not be able to meet delivery projections for the new line.

The company has recorded consistent net losses in the previous 12 quarters. That’s because, in many ways, Tesla still has a start-up mentality, writes The Car Connection's Richard Read:

While Tesla's losses might sound alarming, they're probably to be expected for a company that is still, to many minds, a start-up. As the saying goes, you've got to spend money to make money, and Tesla is spending like crazy in the hope that its investments will pay off down the road. (Based on the very strong demand for the Model 3 sedan, that may be a safe bet.)

Translation: the numbers aren't so good now, but once Tesla has its facilities in order, the financials could level out. Until then, it will have to make do with fairly modest sales revenue and funds generated from sources like stock sales, which pumped $1.7 billion into the company's coffers in May.

Tesla’s investments appear to have paid off for now, but there’s a caveat. The company buoyed third quarter profits by selling $138.5 million in clean-car credits, but those are likely to add little revenue in the fourth quarter. Meanwhile, it’s still unclear whether Tesla’s purchase of SolarCity would make or break the company’s finances.

Shareholders from both companies are expected to vote on the proposed deal on November 17. Since most of the company’s capital spending will occur next quarter, Tesla may end the year with negative cash flow, analysts say.

"It was a kitchen sink effort to get the third quarter to look good ahead of the deal vote," CFRA Research analyst Efraim Levy told Reuters.

This report includes material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.