In the wake of Time Warner deal, what happens to T-Mobile?

As pay-TV companies continue to shore up business through mergers and acquisitions, analysts say T-Mobile could be the next target.

Kacper Pempel/Reuters/File
Workers redecorate a former Era Mobile phone outlet with the T-Mobile logo in Warsaw, Poland on June, 1, 2011.

In the internet age, consolidation is an attractive option for large telecom companies. Wireless carriers want in-house content to draw mobile users, and media producers want digital distribution. That’s why, on Saturday, AT&T revealed plans to purchase Time Warner for $85.4 billion. And the acquisitions likely won’t stop there, analysts say.

“The takeout target over the next twelve months has got to be T-Mobile,” New Street Research analyst Spencer Kurn told Reuters.

T-Mobile, the third largest wireless carrier in the United States, would make an attractive purchase. The company accounted for most of the industry’s subscriber and revenue growth in the third quarter, and shares have jumped 9.5 percent since Monday. And there’s no shortage of potential buyers: Comcast, Dish Network, and Mexican telecom company America Movil may show renewed interest in T-Mobile in the coming months, say analysts.

Public perception of the media industry is becoming increasingly negative. Only 32 percent of Americans say they have a “great deal” or “fair amount” of trust in the mass media – an 8 percent drop from just one year ago – according to a recent Gallup poll.

Meanwhile, large-scale media acquisitions continue in spite of antitrust regulators. In 2013, Comcast took NBCUniversal in a $17 billion deal. A year later, Time Warner bought cable TV provider Charter Communications for $38 billion. Last year, AT&T snapped up DirecTV for $48.5 billion.

But what does that mean for consumers?

Mergers "can be a mixed bag," The Christian Science Monitor’s Schuyler Velasco reported in May 2014, as AT&T was pursuing a DirecTV deal:

In general, fewer companies means less competition and the potential for one company or another to completely dominate a given market. That’s something antitrust regulators looked to prevent, in fact, when they blocked a potential purchase of T-Mobile by AT&T in 2011.

But big mergers may also benefit consumers, analysts say. Consolidated telecom giants, such as the new AT&T, tend to dominate certain regional markets. By teaming up, media producers and wireless carriers could compete in those same spaces. That’s why prices may actually drop, if and when T-Mobile is purchased.

“If we as consumers have the choice for either AT&T or Verizon or CenturyLink or Comcast or whatever in the same space, that will drive innovation, and drive prices down,” media industry analyst Jeff Kagan told the Monitor in 2014. “There is a growing level of competition that there wasn’t 10 years ago.”

This report includes material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.