Susan Walsh/AP/File
Wells Fargo chief executive officer John Stumpf testifies on Capitol Hill before the Senate Banking Committee last week.

Facing outrage, Wells Fargo CEO steps down from Fed advisory council

Facing bipartisan condemnation over the creation of millions of false accounts allegedly opened by his bank without customers' knowledge, Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf has agreed to resign his position on the advisory council for the Federal Reserve's San Francisco region.

Despite the stark divisions in the US political landscape, one issue recent has garnered remarkable bipartisan consensus: the scandal at Wells Fargo.

The embattled chief executive officer, John Stumpf, resigned Thursday from the Federal Reserve's advisory council, two days after suffering the ire of both Republicans and Democrats on a Senate panel, venting their outrage at the alleged sales abuses undertaken by thousands of Wells Fargo employees.

"John made a personal decision to resign as the Twelfth District's representative to the Federal Advisory Council. His top priority is leading Wells Fargo," Wells Fargo spokesman Mark Folk told Reuters.

During Mr. Stumpf's hearing before the Senate Banking Committee, saying that he was "deeply sorry" wasn't enough to deflect a verbal assault by members of both parties on the panel. They accused the bank of fraud and told Stumpf he was scapegoating lower-level employees – 5,300 of whom have been fired over the activity – while leaving senior executives unscathed.

Analysts say the illegal activity, which included opening unauthorized accounts and signing people up for online banking without consent, was driven by punishing sales targets. A typical employee, according to the Associated Press, was required to sell between 13 and 15 banking products each day, with high targets stretching even to small towns.

There is also concern over the apparent connection between some of Stumpf's bonuses and the drive to increase the number of customer accounts, whereby the CEO was rewarded for higher figures, leading to what CNN's Matt Egan and Chris Isidore described as "a pressure-cooker atmosphere."

Meanwhile, as senators call for Stumpf's resignation and the initiation of criminal investigations, former Wells Fargo employees are suing the bank for $2.6 billion, under claims of unfair dismissal. Yet these employees are not the ones relieved of their employment because they engaged in fraudulent activities; rather, they are those who lost their jobs after failing to meet quotas because they refused to break the law.

"The biggest victims of this scheme are a class of people that nobody else has talked about," reads the lawsuit. "The biggest victims of Wells Fargo's scam [are] the class of victims that were fired because they did not meet these cross sell quotas by engaging in the fraudulent scam that would line the CEO's pockets."

Material from the Associated Press and Reuters was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Facing outrage, Wells Fargo CEO steps down from Fed advisory council
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today